- ntg-context - Mailing Lists

Is there documentation for the memo module?
by Michael Ash 27 Oct '13

27 Oct '13

The code is at http://bay.uchicago.edu/tex-archive/macros/context/contrib/context-letter/t… Thank you very much. Sincerely, Michael

2 1

tikz-3dplot?
by Xan 26 Oct '13

26 Oct '13

Hi, Is there available tikz-3dplot [http://www.ctan.org/pkg/tikz-3dplot] for ConTeXt? Is it possible to use it? Thanks in advance, Xan

2 2

ConTeXt Suite and system fonts
by Pablo Rodriguez 26 Oct '13

26 Oct '13

Dear list, since the topic isn’t specific to MacOSX, I’m starting a new thread. [I assume that OSFONTDIR won’t be set by default in Linux. I’m fine with that.] I think system fonts should be enabled by default in Win and Mac. I think it is a nice feature to newcomers. Of course, Thomas is fully right in requesting not to be forced to use the system fonts. Being the default the use of system fonts, wouldn’t it be possible to add an argument such as "--disable-osfontdir" to first-setup? Just in case it helps, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

1 0

Re: [NTG-context] dejavu: inline math fraction spacing too tight?
by Hans Hagen 26 Oct '13

26 Oct '13

On 10/26/2013 3:53 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > Unicode sure makes things easy: > > U+002F / SOLIDUS SLASH > U+2044 ⁄ FRACTION SLASH > U+2215 ∕ DIVISION SLASH > U+FF0F ／ FULLWIDTH SOLIDUS FULLWIDTH SLASH > > Of course, we key in ascii / (0x2f). > From how these display (in DejaVu monospace), I would think that the > division slash is what should be used. I can revert to 002F and (if needed make a patch in lfg files) but you're right with respect to xits and 2215 (002F does not have a descender which looks somewhat weird). Hans -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

not getting latest beta from Suite
by Pablo Rodriguez 26 Oct '13

26 Oct '13

Dear list, as Alan pointed two days ago, running: rsync -ptv rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/setup/first-setup.sh . && ./first-setup.sh --modules=all gets beta from 2013.10.15 13:52, while I think it should get beta from 2013.10.20 07:09. I’m on Fedora 19, not on MacOSX (just in case anyone wonders). I guess this may be a bug. Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

1 0

Re: [NTG-context] dejavu: inline math fraction spacing too tight?
by "H. Özoguz" 26 Oct '13

26 Oct '13

> \setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt] > \starttext > $a/b$ > > $1/2$ > > $π/3$ > \stoptext > > Is this indeed the desired spacing? What do others think? > > Thanks. I think you are right, I don't know if this is really desired, but I don't think so. Escpecially one gets problems with "2" in the denominator. \setupbodyfont [dejavu,12pt] \starttext $1/2$ $1\,/\,2$ \stoptext The second hand-tuned example is obviously nicer. Huseyin

5 7

Using CMYK for print jobs
by hwitloc＠gmail.com 25 Oct '13

25 Oct '13

A printer I want to use only handles files which use CMYK colorspace/model.. I tried building my mkiv file using cmyk=yes, as shown below: \setupcolors[state=start, rgb=no, cmyk=yes, overprint=yes] Using ImageMagick's identify program to check the resulting file it show the following: Resolution: 72x72 Print size: 3.58333x2.16667 Units: Undefined Type: PaletteMatte Endianess: Undefined Colorspace: RGBde delegate for this image format `/home/user_a' @ error/constitut Depth: 16/8-bit. Channel depth: red: 8-bit green: 8-bit blue: 8-bit alpha: 1-bit GIMP also shows an RGB model for the resulting pdf file. Also is this mention of pixel resultion of 72x72 correct or useful? I tried to get a 300 dpi resolution for output. Any ideas and advice would be appreciated.

2 1

\startstructurelevel
by Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. 25 Oct '13

25 Oct '13

Hello, is there a default structure (if so, what is its name?) which would yield \subsection when used inside \section, so: \starttext \section{Sec} \startstructurelevel[title={SSec}] % This should give \subsection, but gives \section (or higher) aaa \stopstructurelevel \startstructurelevel[a-name-of-default][title={SSec2}] % This should give \subsection, but gives \section (or higher) aaa \stopstructurelevel \stoptext Best regards, Lukas -- Ing. Lukáš Procházka [mailto:LPr@pontex.cz] Pontex s. r. o. [mailto:pontex@pontex.cz] [http://www.pontex.cz] Bezová 1658 147 14 Praha 4 Tel: +420 244 062 238 Fax: +420 244 461 038

2 1

Re: [NTG-context] Aligning Part-Title in TOC
by "H. Özoguz" 25 Oct '13

25 Oct '13

Any ideas ... ? :)

1 0

ConTeXt standalone - in what situations is it better?
by Lars Huttar 24 Oct '13

24 Oct '13

Hello, I was looking into simplefonts (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/simplefonts) and noticed the clause > if you’re running ConTeXt Standalone > <http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone> (which is a better > option) Well I'm using TeXLive, but am happy to take good advice, so I looked at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone to see why it would be a better option. The basic reason I can see is that Standalone is updated more frequently. So if you're using bleeding-edge features of ConTeXt (including recent fixes to simplefonts?), I can see wanting to use Standalone and have access to the latest features and fixes. On the other hand, if you're working on a large production project that has to be careful of stability, is there any advantage to Standalone over TeXLive? Sure, you can keep a standalone version frozen in place, but then that seems equivalent to staying with an existing version of TeXLive. The other issue for me with Standalone is that the only version listed for Windows is "W32TeX". When I go to the web page for that platform, I don't see any information about what W32TeX is; just how to install it. It sounds like it's specific to 32-bit systems, and mine is 64-bit. But I suppose in that regard it's no different from TeXLive -- the executables are 32-bit but they run fine on 64-bit systems. Does anybody have advice for me on other reasons for switching from TeXLive to ConTeXt Standalone, or reasons not to? Thanks, Lars

5 5