- ntg-context - NTG Mailing Lists

Re: [NTG-context] [metapost] Stroke Font
by Wolfgang Schuster 17 May '15

17 May '15

> Am 17.05.2015 um 22:54 schrieb Troy Henderson <thenders(a)gmail.com>: > > I updated pstoedit, and it functions as expected. > > This is not a MetaPost question but rather a ConTeXt question: How do I use Arev Bold (Sans) in ConTeXt? Use the DejaVu fonts which are like Arev Sans a extended version of Bitsream Vera. \setupbodyfont[dejavu] \starttext \input knuth \ss\input knuth \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula \stoptext Wolfgang

1 0

parenthesis in Arabic text
by Sam Ḥilluc 17 May '15

17 May '15

Greetings, I'm trying to typeset an Arabic text, but I have a problem with parenthesis in footnotes. The following example: \usemodule[simplefonts] \setmainfont[amiri][features=arabic,range=arabic] \setupdirections[bidi=global] \setupalign[righttoleft] \def\text{(ب)} \startdocument \text\footnote{\text}. \stopdocument gives the correct order in the text but the parenthesis are not adapted in the footnote. So in the text I get: (ب) And in the footnote: )ب(.

2 2

DejaVu 2.35
by Thomas Floeren 17 May '15

17 May '15

As a side note: There’s a new release of DejaVu. -- Tom > Hi everyone, > > It's long overdue, but it has finally arrived: we present to you the 2.35 > release! > > > For the changelog, check http://dejavu-fonts.org/wiki/Changelog > > Packages are available on SourceForge. For links check > http://dejavu-fonts.org/wiki/Download > > > To our contributers: we aren't opening SVN yet, as we will move the code to > github (which will hopefully be a smooth transition and finished later today). > More details about will follow. > > Greetings > Ben

1 0

Weird position of equation numbers for long equations
by Mojca Miklavec 16 May '15

16 May '15

Hi, I suspect that the equation numbering in attachment (eq-with-chapter.png) is wrong. Shouldnt't the number be positioned on the right (not on the left)? And in case that this positioning on the left is intentional: is there any way or setting to force the equation number to be moved to the right? In any case I suspect that the equation in question could somehow be squeezed into the available space in one line. What's the best trick to squeeze the equation into a single line? Some kind of "\hbox to 0pt{\hss [content] \hss}" trickery or does there exist something better? Minimum problematic example: \starttext \placeformula \startformula \dorecurse{28}{a+} \stopformula \stoptext Thank you, Mojca

5 11

language mode with XML
by Pablo Rodriguez 16 May '15

16 May '15

Dear list, I have the following sample: \startbuffer[demo] <doc lang="es"> <h1>Document Title</h1> <p>Text from paragraph.</p> <h1>Document Title</h1> <p>Text from paragraph.</p> </doc> \stopbuffer \startxmlsetups xml:initialize \xmlsetsetup{#1}{doc|h1|p}{xml:*} \stopxmlsetups \xmlregistersetup{xml:initialize} \startxmlsetups xml:doc \mainlanguage[\xmlatt{#1}{lang}] \title{\currentdate} % to display language \xmlflush{#1} \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:h1 \section{\xmlflush{#1}} \stopxmlsetups \startxmlsetups xml:p \xmlflush{#1} \stopxmlsetups \setupindenting[yes, always, big] \startmode[**es] \setupheads[indentnext=yes] \stopmode \starttext \xmlprocessbuffer{main}{demo}{} \stoptext Is there no other way to make indentation after headings work than to include it inside xml:doc? Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

1 0

Changing font for math function
by Maggyero 16 May '15

16 May '15

> Aditya Mahajan: > By default, in all three formats the font for \log is mathupright rather > than textrm. There needs to be a rationale for ConTeXt default to be > different from other formats. Do you have any reference to a math book or > journal that uses text fonts for \log-like operators? Thanks for the examples. I had forgotten that math fonts can differ from text fonts. Now I understand why you use \mathupright (which, according to the source code is identical in math mode to \mathrm and \rm). And I know that math fonts have different kerning and ligatures than text fonts. But how is that in LaTeX, kerning and ligatures in math mode inside \mathrm are the same as those of the TEXT font (while in ConTeXt \mathrm still uses the kerning and ligatures of the math font, which seems logical)? Compare the following: LaTeX: \documentclass{article} \begin{document} affinity\par $\mathrm{affinity}$\par % kerning and ligatures of TEXT mode with math font \end{document} ConTeXt: \starttext affinity\par $\mathrm affinity$\par % kerning and ligatures of MATH mode with math font \stoptext Maggyero

2 1

2 issues in phys-dim.mkiv
by Maggyero 16 May '15

16 May '15

I've tried the unit interface today, and I've noticed two issues with the following example: \setupunits[alternative=text] \starttext $\unit{-4.6e-3 km s^-1}$ \stoptext 1. Minus superscripts for UNITS (so 's^-1' here—not 'e-3', which is fine) are converted to hyphens with the 'text' unit alternative (with the default 'mathematics' unit alternative everything is fine): 2. The times symbol between the number and the 10^-3 (e-3) is incorrectly spaced (as an ordinary math atom instead of a binary math atom) so doesn't look good. Maybe Hans could change \def\digitstimessymbol{\times} to \def\digitstimessymbol{\ifmmode\times\else${}\times{}$\fi} in phys-dim.mkiv?

2 1

horizontal spacing
by henman 16 May '15

16 May '15

In the below example, used with the latest standalone ConTeXt version, I can only get \hskip to work when the parameter is 1 dimension unit. e.g. 1em or 1cm for example. How can I get a larger horizontal space say 3em , rather that having to write \hskip 1em \hskip 1em \hskip 1em three times? ------------- minimal example follows: \starttext \framed[ width=8cm, height=4cm, align={flushleft}] {Here is the minimum example: \crlf \hskip 1em 1em space before this line? \crlf \hskip 2em 2em space before this line? \crlf \hskip 3em 3em space before this line? \crlf \hskip+1em 1em space before this line? \crlf \hskip+2em 2em space before this line? \crlf \hskip+3em 3em space before this line? \crlf \hskip+1cm 1cm space before this line? \crlf \hskip+2cm 2cm space before this line? \crlf \hskip+3cm 3cm space before this line? \crlf \stoptext

2 1

Changing font for math function
by Maggyero 16 May '15

16 May '15

> Aditya Mahajan: > The default should be \mathupright (as is the case in amstex and latex, and probably also plaintex). > Hans Hagen: > next beta: when one of the stylealternatives text mode else mathmode > (default nothing == math upright) > Hans Hagen: >> Because like in \mtext, the \text command is ESSENTIAL (for the function names to have the mathcodes, kerning and ligatures of the text mode instead of the ones of the math mode). >that is not needed because if you use a style known as text style a text font is used Alright, but why not ALWAYS use your text style (or my \text), why talking about \mathupright then? \mathupright should never be used to display a name in text style in my opinion. I don't get it, is there something that I missed with that \mathupright? (And I'm not managing to download the new beta of yesterday so I don't have access to the new code yet). Appart from that story of \text or not \text, what do you think about the suggestion that I gave in the conclusion of my previous post? Do you plan to still use version 1 or to implement version 2 after the freeze for TeXLive 2015? My conclusion was: CONCLUSION. — It all comes down to the choice of the best user interface for math functions and math texts (usually used as subscripts of variables). Their styles and colors is handled with \setupmathematics. There are two choices of user interface: 1. $\normalmathop{\mfunction{Arsinh}}\nolimits x\ \text{and}\ n_{\mtext{air}}$. 2. $\mfunction{Arsinh} x\ \text{and}\ n_{\mtext{air}}$. First, the default functionstyle and textstyle in \setupmathematics should be \rm\tf (the text mode equivalent of \mathupright, as we are always in text mode thanks to the \text hardcoded in \mfunction and \mtext). Then, in the 1st solution \normalmathop is used instead of \mathop because the latter is modified by ConTeXt to convert \rm to \mf, which makes \setupmathematics[functionstyle=\rm] without effect. The 2nd solution is obviously way cleaner, that is why I think it should be preferred. The implementation is given in my '2nd DEFINITION of \mfunction' for replacing the existing definition in math-ini.mkiv: ——————————————————————— \unexpanded\def\mfunction{\dosingleempty\domfunction} \def\domfunction[#1]#2% {\iffirstargument \doifelse{#1}{op}{\normalmathop{\text{\usemathematicsstyleandcolor\c!functionstyle\c!functioncolor#2}}}{\doifelse{#1}{limop}{\normalmathop{\text{\usemathematicsstyleandcolor\c!functionstyle\c!functioncolor#2}}}{\normalmathop{\text{\usemathematicsstyleandcolor\c!functionstyle\c!functioncolor#2}}\nolimits}} \else \normalmathop{\text{\usemathematicsstyleandcolor\c!functionstyle\c!functioncolor#2}}\nolimits \fi} ——————————————————————— We also saw that \mfunctionlabeltext is inconsistent with ConTeXt \labeltext because the former has a style attached to it, so \mfunctionlabeltext should be removed from math-ini.mkiv and \mfunction{\mathlabeltext } should be used instead when needed. To go even further in userfriendlyness, we the new macro \definemathcommand should be added in math-ini.mkiv: ——————————————————————— \unexpanded\def\definemathfunction{\dodoubleempty\dodefinemathfunction} \def\dodefinemathfunction[#1][#2]#3% {\ifsecondargument \definemathcommand[#1]{\mfunction[#2]{#3}} \else \definemathcommand[#1]{\mfunction{#3}} \fi} ——————————————————————— Finally, with this new \mfunction definition and the removal of the misleading \mfunctionlabeltext, the functions defined in math-def.mkiv should be rewrite as: ——————————————————————— \definemathcommand[cos]{\mfunction{\mathlabeltext{cos}}} % Or \definemathcommand[cos]{\mfunction[nolop]{\mathlabeltext{cos}}}, it is the same. \definemathcommand[det]{\mfunction[limop]{\mathlabeltext{det}}} \definemathcommand[diff]{\normalmathop{\text{\mathfunctionstyle d}}\mathopen{}} %etc. ——————————————————————— or ——————————————————————— \definemathfunction[cos]{\mathlabeltext{cos}} % Or \definemathfunction[cos][nolop]{\mathlabeltext{cos}}, it is the same. \definemathfunction[det][limop]{\mathlabeltext{det}} \definemathcommand[diff]{\normalmathop{\text{\mathfunctionstyle d}}\mathopen{}} % It is a special function so it should still be treated with the more general \definemathcommand. %etc. ——————————————————————— ConTeXt users are now provided, if Hans agrees to implement the code given in this conclusion, with three extremely useful macros: — \mtext (that should be used for all math texts such as subscripts of variables): $n_{\mtext{air}}$; — \mfunction (the equivalent of LaTeX \operatorname macro of the amsopn package): $\mfunction{Arsinh} x$ $\mfunction[op]{Arsinh} x$ or equivalently $\mfunction[limop]{Arsinh} x$; — \definemathfunction (the equivalent of LaTeX \DeclareMathOperator macro of the amsopn package): \definemathfunction[arsinh]{Arsinh} $\arsinh x$ \definemathfunction[arsinh][op]{Arsinh} $\arsinh x$ or equivalently \definemathfunction[arsinh][limop]{Arsinh} $\arsinh x$. Maggyero

3 2

before= and after= for \setuphighlight
by Kate F 15 May '15

15 May '15

Hi, I'm looking for something like \definehighlight which I can use to markup various things in inline body text. I want different environments to be able to have their own setups to configure how these appear, just as \setuphighlight would provide. However there's one situation which I can't think how to handle; I'd like to have a setup append and prepend some text, just like before= and after= for various other setups. If \setuphighlight had before= and after=, this would suit me perfectly. But it doesn't. Is there something similar to \setuphighlight which has before= and after=? Or any other ideas? Thank you, -- Kate

3 4