- ntg-context - Mailing Lists

OT salt feature not working?
by Pablo Rodriguez 19 Mar '17

19 Mar '17

Dear list, I have the following sample: \definefontfeature[default][default][salt=yes] \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][Neo Euler] \setupbodyfont[mainface] \starttext \startTEXpage[offset=1em] 1110 \type{1110} \stopTEXpage \stoptext I get the same results with or without the first line commented out. (I’m using latest beta from 2017.03.02 22:23.) Is this a bug or what am I missing? Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

1 1

Re: [NTG-context] output of the table is wierd
by Jeong Dal 17 Mar '17

17 Mar '17

Dear Wolfgang, You are right. After putting “|”, the output is correct. I did right in other tables except the given one. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. Best regards, Dalyoung

1 0

Caption with new line
by Kostirya 17 Mar '17

17 Mar '17

Hello. I use \vbox to separate headtext from text in chapter header by new line. \define[2]\MyChapterCommand{\vbox{\centeraligned{\headtext{chapter} #1.\\#2}}} \define[1]\DotAfterNumber{\doiftext{#1}{#1.}} \setuphead[chapter][command=\MyChapterCommand] \setuphead[title][numbercommand=\DotAfterNumber,command=] Tell me, please, how can I do like for Captions of Floating Objects? Nick.

1 1

The requested font has no files for the 'tf' alternative
by Marco Patzer 16 Mar '17

16 Mar '17

Hi! I run into a problem using some fonts. Latin Modern is used instead and ConTeXt displays: selectfont > The requested font 'Caecilia LT Std Roman' has no files for the 'tf' alternative, Latin Modern is used instead. Example: \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [Caecilia LT Std Roman] %% doesn't work, either %% [tf=file:CaeciliaLTStd-Roman.otf] \setupbodyfont [mainface] \starttext %% \definedfont [name:CaeciliaLTStd-Roman] %% this works \input knuth \stoptext The font is in the database: mtxrun -script fonts -list -all caecilia This happens with other fonts too, not only Caecilia. Some fonts work, others don't. Couldn't find anything on the list, so I might be doing something wrong here. What's the issue here? context: 2017.03.02 22:23 Marco

5 15

output of the table is wierd
by Jeong Dal 16 Mar '17

16 Mar '17

Dear all, I made a column as following: … \starttabulate[|c|c] \HL \NC $\sim (p \vee q)$ \VL $\sim p \ \wedge \sim q$ \NC\NR \HL \NC $\sim (p \ \wedge q)$ \VL $\sim p \vee \sim q$ \NC\NR \HL \NC $\sim (p \to q) $ \VL $p \wedge \sim q$ \NC\NR \HL \NC $\sim (p \leftrightarrow q)$ \VL $(p \ \wedge \sim q) \vee (q \ \wedge \sim p)$ \NC\NR \HL \stoptabulate … The first column is OK. But lines in the first three rows in the second column expanded to the width as wide as the last row. So the it looked very strange. Is there a way to avoid such a bad looking output? I am using latest luatex and ConTeXt stand alone in OSX. Thank you. Best regards, Dalyoung

2 1

bug in filling fields and Acrobat Reader XI?
by Pablo Rodriguez 15 Mar '17

15 Mar '17

Dear list, I have the following sample: \usemodule[fields] \starttext This is a \fillinfield[name]{text that defines field length}. \stoptext I’m afraid that Adobe Reader XI (in Windows 10) isn’t able to keep the text in the field after the pointer moves outside the field. Could anyone confirm the bug or explain me what I’m doing wrong? Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

3 7

hunting a lua stack error
by Alan Bowen 13 Mar '17

13 Mar '17

This is the error message lua error > lua error on line 112 in file c_09-02_Evans.tex: C stack overflow stack traceback: [C]: in function 'type' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:373: in function <...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:367> [C]: in function 'tostring' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:342: in function <...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:317> [C]: in function 'tostring' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:342: in function <...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:317> [C]: in function 'tostring' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:342: in function <...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:317> [C]: in function 'tostring' ... [C]: in function 'tostring' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:342: in function <...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:317> [C]: in function 'tostring' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:342: in function <...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:317> [C]: in function 'tostring' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:342: in function <...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:317> [C]: in function 'tostring' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ini.lua:730: in function 'pdfshareobjectreference' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/lpdf-ano.lua:664: in function 'prerollreference' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/node-ref.lua:601: in function 'setreference' ...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/node-ref.lua:847: in function <...eXt/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/mkiv/node-ref.lua:844> (...tail calls...) the cause is the line: \cite[Evans, Carman, and Thorndike 2010] the problem: \cite[{{Evans, Carman, and Throndike 2010}}] is not fix the oddity: the file is full of entries like \cite[A, B, and C 2017] and worse. If I comment out the offending line, the file processes as it should. My test file does not duplicate the problem: it just shows another one ( that may or may not be relevant): \definedescription[BibItem][ width=broad, margin=1.5pc, indenting={no}, indentnext=no, alternative=hanging, hang=1, headcommand=\gobbleoneargument, align=right, before={\directsetup{tightspace}\bgroup\language[packed]}, after={\egroup}, ] \definereferenceformat [cite] [type=title,left={},right={}] \definereferenceformat [bibpage] [type=page] %\setupinteraction[state=start] \starttext \dorecurse{10}{\cite[A],\\ \cite[A and B],\\ \cite[{{A, B, and C}}]\blank} \page \startbibitem[A] A \stopbibitem \startbibitem[A and B] A and B \stopbibitem \startbibitem[{{A, B, and C}}] A, B, and C \stopbibitem \stoptext The file processes but does not show the “A, B, and C” when interaction is activated. Alan

3 3

hidden file attachments in beta from 2017.03.02 22:23
by Pablo Rodriguez 13 Mar '17

13 Mar '17

Dear list, I have the following sample: \setupinteraction[state=start] \starttext \attachment[file=oeps.tex,title=Oeps,author=Hans, subtitle=TeX File,method=hidden] \input zapf \stoptext I’m afraid that all I get is an empty text file labeled as attachment. If I remove method=hidden, I don’t get any annotation (or evince isn’t able to detect it [not sure about that]). Am I missing something or is this a bug in latest beta (2017.03.02 22:23)? Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

1 0

adding forms to an existing PDF document
by Pablo Rodriguez 13 Mar '17

13 Mar '17

Dear list, I have received a PDF document, in which I have to add fill-in fields. The wiki provides good information on how to do the widget part (of course, most comes from “Widgets uncovered” by Hans ;-)). After searching in the wiki, I realize that my question may be stupid. But I have to ask it: is there any other way to get absolute positions for those field avoiding layers? Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk

2 2

everybeforeoutput vs everyafteroutput
by Michael Eidenbenz 11 Mar '17

11 Mar '17

hello, i try to understand the difference of everybeforeoutput and everafteroutput to inject some pages. it seems as there is no difference. \the\everybeforeoutput is placed after the output of the page: \newtoks\Before \appendtoks \the\Before \global\Before\emptytoks \to\everybeforeoutput \newtoks\After \appendtoks \the\After \global\After\emptytoks \to\everyafteroutput \starttext \input{knuth}\par \appendtoks{before}\to\Before \appendtoks{after}\to\After \stoptext this code in page-otr.mkvi seems to put it before the content: \def\page_otf_set_engine_output_routine#content% {\global\output {\inotrtrue \the\everybeforeoutput #content\relax \the\everyafteroutput}} can this be fixed? thanks michael

2 2