- ntg-context - Mailing Lists

Check brackets and parentheses
by Gilbert Houtekamer 06 Jul '12

06 Jul '12

Hi, I sometimes find myself looking for misplaced and missing brackets for a long time, as context may given errors about a completely different location. For example this one took me a while \goto{\url[localhost20381}[url(localhost20381)] (missing ] after this localhost20381). Is there a SciTE or Notepad++ or command line script that anyone wrote to help with this? It can be more or less sophisticated, but I found that missing / mismatched { [ ] } give the most confusing errors. Thanks, Best regards/vriendelijke groeten Gilbert

5 5

nested alignment?
by Marko Schütz Schmuck 06 Jul '12

06 Jul '12

Dear All, I'm trying to get a nested alignment in math mode: +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | ..... & ................ | | +--------------------------------------------------+ | | | ..... & ................. | | | | ............................. | | | +--------------------------------------------------+ | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ Using \startformula \startalign \NC ..... \NC ................ \NR \NC \NC \startalign \NC ..... \NC ................. \NR \NC \NC ............................. \stopalign \stopalign \stopformula does not produce the desired result. How can I achieve this alignment? Thanks in advance and best regards, Marko

1 0

Broken Nightly 2012.07.04 23:48 - \xRightarrow
by Prashanth 06 Jul '12

06 Jul '12

Hi, Some math symbols seem to be failing with the latest nightly build. Minimal example: \starttext \section{blah} AAAAA $a \xRightarrow b$ BBBBB. \stoptext I see this in the output: ConTeXt ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV fmt: 2012.7.6 int: english/english system > tex > error on line 3 in file demo.context: Undefined control sequence ... ... ... ... \math_arrows_construct_single ...s \p_mathspacing \endcsname \p_mathspacing ... \math_arrows_handle_finalize ...{#7}{#1}{#4}{}{#8} }\fi \else \ifsecondargume... <to be read again> b l.3 AAAAA $a \xRightarrow b $ BBBBB. ! Undefined control sequence. system > tex > error on line 3 in file demo.context: Undefined control sequence ...

1 0

setuppagenumber
by Meer, H. van der 06 Jul '12

06 Jul '12

Is \setuppagenumber broken? Or do it misuse it? In the next minimal example the pagenumbers are not reset after the third page, as I would expect. Hans van der Meer \setuppapersize[A6][A6] \starttext \setuppagenumber[number=1,state=start] page 1\page page 2\page page 3\page \setuppagenumber[number=1] page 4\page page 5\page page 6\page \stoptext

3 3

linenumbering per page
by Martin 06 Jul '12

06 Jul '12

Hi, I would like to place line numbers in a multipage document. \startlinenumbering lots of text filling several pages \stoplinenumbering What I would like to have, and fail to find, is an option to that would restart the numbering on every page as I do not need to reference each line. e.g. finding line 15 on page 6 is fine. \setuplinenumbering doesn't seem to provide an option. Anything I can do? Thanks! Martin

2 2

itemize behaviour
by Meer, H. van der 06 Jul '12

06 Jul '12

I do not understand the workings of the itemize. What I want is two nested itemlists. The outer one unpacked, the inner one packed. In the inner one the itemlist should be joinedup with the text before it. I do not get this working, see the examples. The inner list is separated from the "Intro to inner list". It looks like the joinedup in the second example has no effect, because deleting it makes no difference. Switching the joinedup over to the outer itemize in the third example pulls everything together and destroys the unpacked of the first list. How to achieve the following? ---------------------------------- - Intro to inner list o one inner list o two inner list - second outer item ---------------------------------- Hans van der Meer \starttext \setupitemgroup[itemize][1][unpacked][symbol=4] \setupitemgroup[itemize][2][unpacked][symbol=5] \startitemize \startitem Intro to inner list. \startitemize \startitem one inner list \stopitem \startitem two inner list \stopitem \stopitemize \stopitem \startitem second outer item \stopitem \stopitemize \blank\thinrule\blank \setupitemgroup[itemize][1][unpacked][symbol=4] \setupitemgroup[itemize][2][packed,joinedup][symbol=5] \startitemize \startitem Intro to inner list. \startitemize \startitem one inner list \stopitem \startitem two inner list \stopitem \stopitemize \stopitem \startitem second outer item \stopitem \stopitemize \blank\thinrule\blank \setupitemgroup[itemize][1][unpacked,joinedup][symbol=4] \setupitemgroup[itemize][2][packed][symbol=5] \startitemize \startitem Intro to inner list. \startitemize \startitem one inner list \stopitem \startitem two inner list \stopitem \stopitemize \stopitem \startitem second outer item \stopitem \stopitemize \stoptext

2 3

clutter with \start and \stop
by Peter Münster 05 Jul '12

05 Jul '12

Hi, Say I want Tufte in 2 columns and Knuth in 1 column: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- \starttext \startcolumns[n=2] \startsection[title=Tufte] \input tufte \stopsection \startsection[title=Tufte and Knuth] \input tufte \stopcolumns \input knuth % \startcolumns[n=1] knuth \stopcolumns does not work \startcolumns[n=2] \input tufte \stopsection \stopcolumns \stoptext --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- It works, but isn't this a bit ugly to mix up the \starts and \stops ? In XML, that would be wrong. Is this just the normal ConTeXt way, or is there a cleaner method? TIA for any hints, -- Peter

4 10

Re: [NTG-context] framed \\
by Meer, H. van der 05 Jul '12

05 Jul '12

Sorry, missed the inclusion of the output of the minimal example. In the ConTeXT manual I see that a construct \framed{A\\B\\C} should type set as three lines below each other: A B C But instead the \\'s disappear without a trace. Did I miss some change on the use of \\'s in \framed? Could it be a sideeffect of recent changes? Hans van der Meer \starttext \framed{A\\B\\C} \stoptext

4 5

framed \\
by Meer, H. van der 05 Jul '12

05 Jul '12

In the ConTeXT manual I see that a construct \framed{A\\B\\C} should type set as three lines below each other: A B C But instead the \\'s<smb://'s> disappear without a trace. Did I miss some change on the use of \\'s<smb://'s> in \framed? Could it be a sideeffect of recent changes? Hans van der Meer

1 0

bug in latest beta
by JIN Xiao-Yong 05 Jul '12

05 Jul '12

I got the following error in the minimal example (which is all shown in the output below) system > tex > error on line 4 in file simpl.tex: Undefined control sequence ... 1 \setuphead[section][before={\column}] 2 \starttext 3 \startcolumns[n=2] 4 >> \section{this is a section} 5 \section{another section in a new column} 6 \stopcolumns 7 \stoptext 8 \208>multicolumn:yes ->\par {\testrulewidth \zeropoint \ruledvskip \textheig... \page_breaks_columns_process ...dle_direct \v!yes \fi \relax \the \everyafte... <to be read again> \relax \dohandleheadpagebreakyes ...ter \c!before \relax \doif {\headparameter \c!a... \docheckheadbefore ...se \continuoussectionhead #1 \fi \doheadspacingbeforeyes ...handleheadpagebreakyes \headparameter \c!inbetwee... ... l.4 \section{this is a section} Basically, the first line in the file introduces the error. It worked a few weeks ago.

3 2