- ntg-context - Mailing Lists

Re: [NTG-context] Documentation for \completecontent
by Tom Benjey 18 Apr '10

18 Apr '10

Whoops! I misstated what is happening. I confused myself. Item 2 is the problem. The TOC and book order are correct. It's just that the introduction can't have the same fancy header as the chapters without placing that same header on the TOC, etc. Tom Benjey 717-258-9733 voice 717-243-0074 fax Twitter: @TomBenjey

1 0

Ligaturing in footnotes.
by Philipp Gesang 18 Apr '10

18 Apr '10

Hi again, footnotes keep me busy: ···8<·········································································· \def\sc{\setfontfeature{smallcaps}} \definefontfeature [default][default] [mode=node,onum=yes,liga=yes] \definefontfeature [smallcaps][default] [mode=node,onum=yes,smcp=yes,liga=yes] \starttext \footnote{ \bgroup \sc Test -- \egroup Test -- .} % disables ligaturing \footnote{ -- \bgroup \sc Test -- \egroup Test -- .} % works fine (!?) \footnote{ \bgroup Test -- \egroup Test -- .} % works fine \footnote{ \bgroup \it Test -- \egroup Test -- .} % works fine \stoptext ···8<·········································································· After switching to the "smallcaps” font feature set, the surrounding “default” set is not restored when leaving the group if and only if the \bgroup was the first token inside the footnote. (I know lm doesn't offer smcp as font feature but the problem is the same with the font I'm using. Try it e.g. on Minion from the acroread free fonts.) What am I doing wrong here? Thanks for any advice, Philipp -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments

2 3

Enumeration
by Antoine Cailliau 18 Apr '10

18 Apr '10

Hi all, I'm working on my thesis and I need a mechanism very similar to float and its reference/caption facilities except it can't be floating. My problem is the following: I've boxes to display corresponding to operators. They should be numbered (like figure, tables, etc.) and having a list is a plus and I should be able to do \about[myoperator] to display the name of the operator. I tried to declare a float and it works perfectly, except it is floating and do not respect the flow I would like to have. I tried enumeration but I can't do \about and I really need it. What is the best way to have such a behavior ? Thanks in advance, Antoine C.

3 5

Re: [NTG-context] basic \cite[]
by Michael Saunders 18 Apr '10

18 Apr '10

Taco: > Try > > \setuppublications[alternative=num] Thank you, but using that I get the same result: \cite[myKey] prints out empty brackets "[]", not "[1]".

4 4

Re: [NTG-context] basic \cite[]
by Michael Saunders 18 Apr '10

18 Apr '10

Taco: > > \placepublications > > Please change the above line to > > \placepublications[criterium=all] Thanks, but that's what I was using already. To be clear, in Mk IV: \usemodule[bib] \setupbibtex[database=myProject] \setuppublications[alternative=num] ... \cite[myKey] ... \placepublications[criterium=all] The references in the back look okay, but at the point where \cite[myKey] occurs, I get empty brackets: "[]", not "[1]".

2 1

basic \cite[]
by Michael Saunders 18 Apr '10

18 Apr '10

I want to be able to write, in my text, \cite[myKey] (where myKey is the key of a record in my .bib file), and have this appear in print as: [<a number>] linked to the bibliograpy page where it (<a number>) occurs. I've been puzzling over bibmod-doc.pdf. I think the solution has to do with the commands \setuppublications and \setupcite, but since bibmod-doc never says what these commands do, it's very difficult. I'm guessing \setuppublications might be able to control what argument I should use in the \cite[] command. I'm guessing \setupcite might control how a citation will be printed in the text. (If this is true, the manual should say so so the reader doesn't have to guess.) One cryptic line tells me: "refcommand the default option for \cite" just like that. Based on this, I'm guessing refcommand=key will let me write things like \cite[myFirstKey]. The manual goes on to clear up the confusion by explaining: "The \cite command has a lot of alternatives, as could be seen above in the setting of ‘refcommand’." That's it---no mention of what \setupcite does. Based on this, I'm hoping that \setupcite[num] will cause the citation to be printed as [<some number>], e.g., [1]. So, I'm using: \usemodule[bib] \setupbibtex[database=myProject] \setuppublications[refcommand=key,alternative=apa,setupinteraction=start,numbering=yes] \setuppublicationlist[] \setupcite[num][] ... \placepublications[criterium=all] The bibliography prints out, but citations appear as empty brackets: "[]". I want them to be numbers linked to the appearance of the same number in the bibliography. There must be a way of doing this?

3 2

Re: [NTG-context] table: vertical distance
by Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

> \define[1]\divisionrule > {\dontleavehmode\blap > {\vskip-\strutht > \blackrule[width=\the\dimexpr.5em*#1\relax,height=2\linewidth]}% > \vskip-\lineheight} Ahh! Yes, this helps a lot. Thank you very much! Wolfgang

1 0

table: vertical distance
by Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

Hallo, I have to typeset a division and have two diverent solutions but they both have problems. %--------------------------------------------------------------------- \starttext {\setuptables[rulethickness=0.05em,distance=small] \starttable[s0|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|] \NC\NC 1\NC 1\NC 0\NC 0\NC 1\NC 1\NC :\NC 1\NC 1\NC = \NC 1\NC 0\NC 0 \NC 0 \NC 1\NC\AR \NC\NC 1\NC 1\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \DC \DL[2] \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DR \NC\NC \NC 0\NC 0\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \NC\NC \NC 0\NC 0\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \DC\DC \DL[2] \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DR \NC\NC \NC \NC 0\NC 0\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \NC\NC \NC \NC 0\NC 0\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \DC\DC\DC \DL[2] \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DR \NC\NC \NC \NC \NC 0\NC 1\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \NC\NC \NC \NC \NC 0\NC 0\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \DC\DC\DC\DC \DL[2] \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DR \NC\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC 1\NC 1\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \NC\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC 1\NC 1\NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC \NC\AR \DC\DC\DC\DC \DC \DL[2]\DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DC \DR \NC\NC\NC\NC\NC\NC\NC 0\NC\NC\NC\NC\NC\NC\NC\NC\NC\NC\AR \stoptable} \setuplines[style=type] \startlines 110011:11=10001 11 -- ~00 ~00 ~-- ~~00 ~~00 ~~-- ~~~01 ~~~00 ~~~-- ~~~~11 ~~~~11 ~~~~-- ~~~~~0 \stoplines \stoptext %--------------------------------------------------------------------- In both examples there is a far to big distance between the lines and the upper digits. But the interline distance as a whole could be smaller. The simulation of a line with '--' in the second example is unsatisfying. Are there some improvments? Or, is there an idea for a better approach? Wolfgang

2 3

code
by R. Bastian 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

Hello, how to translate in context the following plain tex: \font\fgras = cmbtt10 {\tt {\obeylines {\fgras def} ra(): \ \ \ \ a = 3 \ \ \ \ b = 4 } } -- René Bastian www.pythoneon.org www.musiques-rb.org http://www.soundsurvey.org.uk/

4 22

lua, footnotes, interaction
by Philipp Gesang 17 Apr '10

17 Apr '10

Good evening all, interaction remains a mystery to me. When tracking things I encountered the following deviation in footnotes: ---8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------- \startluacode track = {} track.preceding = "" function track.simple(arg) context("Last one:\\ {\\bf " .. track.preceding .. "}.\\ " .. "This one:\\ {\\bf " .. arg .. "}") if arg == track.preceding then context("\\ -- matching!") else context("\\ -- not matching!") track.preceding = arg end end \stopluacode \def\track#1{\ctxlua{track.simple("#1")}} \def\foottrack#1{\footnote{\ctxlua{track.simple("#1")}}} \starttext \section{Normal} \track{one}\par \track{two}\par \track{two}\par \track{one}\par \track{one}\par \track{two}\par \track{one}\par \section{In Footnotes} \foottrack{one} \foottrack{two} \foottrack{two} \foottrack{one} \foottrack{one} \foottrack{two} \foottrack{one} \setupinteraction[state=start] \section{In Footnotes, interaction enabled} \footnote{\hrule} \foottrack{one} \foottrack{two} \foottrack{two} \foottrack{one} \foottrack{one} \foottrack{two} \foottrack{one} \stoptext % vim:ft=context ---8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd naively expect \track#1 to behave identically regardless of interaction. How do I make it interaction-proof, and, if possible, how do I interaction-proof macros in general? Thanks for your efforts, Philipp -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments

3 5