- dev-context - NTG Mailing Lists

math-stc.mkvi: \mathdouble
by Wolfgang Schuster 17 Sep '15

17 Sep '15

Hi Hans, the definition for \mathdouble is wrong (I guess you did this because it’s not really used) because it takes only a code point instead of two (the second always takes the default value 0): \unexpanded\def\mathdouble{\begingroup\dodoubleempty\math_stackers_handle_double} \def\math_stackers_handle_double[#category]% {\math_stackers_direct_double\plusone\plusone {\iffirstargument#category\else\v!bottom\fi}} % will be defined later on \def\math_stackers_direct_double#top#bottom#category#codepoint#text% {\math_stackers_make_double#top#bottom{#category}{#codepoint}{0}{#text}% \endgroup} Wolfgang

1 0

math-stc.mkvi: moffset key
by Wolfgang Schuster 16 Sep '15

16 Sep '15

Hi Hans, what is the purpose of the moffset key for \setupmathstackers? There is a definition where you assign a dimension to the key \definemathstackers [\v!wide] [\c!moffset=\thickmuskip,\c!mathclass=\s!rel] but this makes no sense as can be seen in the code below because it isn’t used. \unexpanded\def\math_stackers_unstacked_normal#category#codepoint% {\begingroup \edef\currentmathstackers{#category}% \edef\p_moffset{\mathstackersparameter\c!moffset}% \ifx\p_moffset\empty \else \mskip\scratchmuskip \fi \ifmmode\math_class_by_parameter\mathstackersparameter\else\dontleavehmode\fi {\usemathstackerscolorparameter\c!color \Umathchar\zerocount\defaultmathfamily#codepoint}% \ifx\p_moffset\empty \else \mskip\scratchmuskip \fi \endgroup} Wolfgang

1 0

math-fen.mkiv: \lfence, \rfence and \mfence
by Wolfgang Schuster 15 Sep '15

15 Sep '15

Hi, when you pass a undefined argument to \lfence (or \rfence and \mfence) you get the "unknown" alternative \setvalue{\??mathleft \s!unknown}{\setfalse\c_math_fenced_done\ifconditional\c_math_fenced_unknown\normalleft \nexttoken\fi} which doesn’t work here because \nexttoken is never set by \lfence but only by \left. Wolfgang

1 0

math-fen.mkvi
by Wolfgang Schuster 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

Hi Hans, is it intended that you used the same names for \left and \right in the defintions below? \installmathfencepair \ulcorner \Luppercorner \ulcorner \Ruppercorner \installmathfencepair \llcorner \Llowercorner \llcorner \Rlowercorner \installmathfencepair \lmoustache \Lmoustache \lmoustache \Rmoustache \installmathfencepair \llbracket \Lopenbracket \llbracket \Ropenbracket \installmathfencepair \lgroup \Lgroup \lgroup \Rgroup Wolfgang

1 0

math-fen.mkvi: \fenced
by Wolfgang Schuster 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

Hi, the \fenced command doesn’t decrement the nesting counter at the end. \unexpanded\def\math_fenced_fenced[#1]#2% {\math_fenced_fenced_start{#1}% #2% \math_fenced_right \stopusemathstyleparameter - \endgroup} + \endgroup + \advance\c_math_fenced_nesting\minusone} Wolfgang

1 0

math-stc.mkvi: \singlebond (was: math-arr.mkiv: \singlebond)
by Wolfgang Schuster 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

> Alan BRASLAU <mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr> > 14. September 2015 16:37 > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:15:33 +0200 > > I am not familiar with $\singlebond$ etc. > > > In ConTeXt, one can also use a different mechanism (chem-str.mkiv): > > \chemical{1,SINGLE,2,DOUBLE,3,TRIPLE,4} > > Looking at the result of the above, I find that the spacing of DOUBLE > should be modified (to .25ex rather than .5ex), a question of > aesthetics? > > Compare this with a third mechanism (mp-chem.mpiv, drawing a chemical > structure rather than writing an inline chemical formula): > > \startchemical > \chemical[ONE,Z0,SB1,Z1,MOV1,Z1,DB1,MOV1,Z1,TB1,MOV1,Z1] [1,2,3,4] > \stopchemical > > Ignore that the horizontal spacing is different, too, for the > structure ONE. I have no need for the commands, I was only surprised why this happened because it made no sense when you look at the definition of \singlebond in math-arr.mkiv. What I noticed now that Hans redefines the command later in math-stc.mkvi where a number delimiter is missing. When you stop TeX’s number scanner with a \relax you get the right output even with a number after \singlebond. -\unexpanded\edef\singlebond{\mathematics{\mathsurround\zeropoint\char\number"002D}} -\unexpanded\edef\doublebond{\mathematics{\mathsurround\zeropoint\char\number"003D}} -\unexpanded\edef\triplebond{\mathematics{\mathsurround\zeropoint\char\number"2261}} +\unexpanded\edef\singlebond{\mathematics{\mathsurround\zeropoint\char\number"002D\relax}} +\unexpanded\edef\doublebond{\mathematics{\mathsurround\zeropoint\char\number"003D\relax}} +\unexpanded\edef\triplebond{\mathematics{\mathsurround\zeropoint\char\number"2261\relax}} Wolfgang

1 0

math-arr.mkiv: \singlebond
by Wolfgang Schuster 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

Hi, the \singlebond (as well as the \doublebond and \triplebond) command doesn’t produce a symbol when you put a number after it. \starttext $ l\singlebond r $\crlf $ 1\singlebond 2 $\crlf %$ 1\doublebond 2 $\crlf %$ 1\triplebond 2 $ \stoptext Wolfgang

2 1

font-ini.mkvi: \bodyfontenvironmentlist
by Wolfgang Schuster 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

Hi, the allocation of the token list \bodyfontenvironmentlist on line 1192 \newtoks\bodyfontenvironmentlist can be removed because the command is redefined a few lines below. Wolfgang

1 0

math-def.mkiv
by Wolfgang Schuster 14 Sep '15

14 Sep '15

Hi, the mathcommand defintion in line 151 misses a "colon" in its name. \definemathcommand [approxcoloncolon] [rel] {\approx\coloncolon\colonsep} -\definemathcommand [colonsim] [rel] {\coloncolon\colonsep\sim} +\definemathcommand [coloncolonsim] [rel] {\coloncolon\colonsep\sim} \definemathcommand [simcoloncolon] [rel] {\sim\coloncolon\colonsep} Wolfgang

1 0

lxml-ini.lua: \clf_xmlafterdocumentsetup
by Wolfgang Schuster 13 Sep '15

13 Sep '15

Hi, the command \clf_xmlafterdocumentsetup takes three arguments and not two. -implement { name = "xmlafterdocumentsetup", actions = lxml.installsetup, arguments = { 4, "string", "string" } } +implement { name = "xmlafterdocumentsetup", actions = lxml.installsetup, arguments = { 4, "string", "string", "string" } } Wolfgang

1 0