@Joaquín + english translator : many thanks for this great and useful contribution to ConTeXt community dev. Impressive. Being interested into contributing to a french version, what would be your prefered way ? In oct 2020, a message proposed to create a GitHub/GitLab repository (or even organization) for this so that anybody can help translating it into other languages: https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2020/099789.html Le 03/01/2021 à 11:32, Saša Janiška a écrit :

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 10:45:00 +0100 Joaquín Ataz López wrote:

Hiya Joaquín,

...

It is precisely the members of this list who need no introduction at all, but it can sometimes be useful to help someone get started with the fascinating typesetting system that is ConTeXt.

Well, I'm the one who (desperately) need it and I'm delighted. :-D

Thanks a lot for providing such a wonderful "introduction" popularizing ConTeXt!!

Sincerely, Gour

On 1/3/2021 5:42 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:

On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 15:37, Garulfo wrote:

...

In oct 2020, a message proposed to create a GitHub/GitLab repository (or even organization) for this so that anybody can help translating it into other languages: https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2020/099789.html

If you want to see it under https://github.com/contextgarden/ just propose the repository name and list the usernames for those who should initially have access. also because that would fit well into the plans for a bunch of context related repositories

Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

On 5 Jan 2021, at 20:31, Garulfo wrote:

Hi all,

I saw that Mojca created a directory https://github.com/contextgarden/not-so-short-introduction-to-context

Joaquín, if you agree, and if - you provide me with the spanish + english source codes - Mojca provide you and me with github write access (garulfogb account)

i could : 1/ push the current code 2/ start to write a github wiki page (+ link on contextgarden) to describe : - for you : how to update from your own computer (the official source) - for any user : how to use git to get the source + link to this list for discussion.

Does anybody has a guide about "how to set up a documentation translation project with git ?". One requirement will probably to define how propositions are officially validated. Does it requires Joaquín to learn how to use git ? Can we just work by sending files (or patches) to Joaquín who will update with a single git command ?

I think we need to be really clear about what we want to achieve here. 1) Is it just making the source plus the PDF available for download? If so then there are plenty of simpler ways to do that than using Git. 2) If it is to gather feedback on things like typos then we don't need Git. For example I spotted a missing ']' in the English translation so all I need is a way to submit a 'bug report' not access to the source. 3) So what is left? To provide a way for translators to be notified of changes to the original? To provide a collaboration mechanism for significant changes to the document? I don't see that Git adds much in the way of value unless Joaquín and the translators are already very familiar with it -- because the learning curve is very steep and recovering from mistakes (made to the repository itself rather than to the document content) can sometimes be extremely difficult. -- Bruce Horrocks Hampshire, UK

On 1/5/2021 9:31 PM, Garulfo wrote:

Hi all,

I saw that Mojca created a directory https://github.com/contextgarden/not-so-short-introduction-to-context

Joaquín, if you agree, and if - you provide me with the spanish + english source codes - Mojca provide you and me with github write access (garulfogb account)

i could : 1/ push the current code 2/ start to write a github wiki page (+ link on contextgarden) to describe : - for you : how to update from your own computer (the official source) - for any user : how to use git to get the source + link to this list for discussion.

Does anybody has a guide about "how to set up a documentation translation project with git ?". One requirement will probably to define how propositions are officially validated. Does it requires Joaquín to learn how to use git ? Can we just work by sending files (or patches) to Joaquín who will update with a single git command ? It's mainly about archiving, right? Those who write and maintain decide to use the repos in whatever way. (Personally I only use the gardens git repos for archiving and occasionally just watching what got changed. I don't even know (or care) how to fetch a specific version other than the latest right now.

Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Here is an example to clarify my previous comment. #+BEGIN_SRC xml <xliff xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:2.0" xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:changetracking:2.0" version="2.1" srcLang="en" trgLang="fr"> <file id="f1"> <unit id="u1"> ctr:changeTrack reviewed translated Bonjour <segment state="reviewed"> <source>Hello</source> <target>Bonjour</target> </segment> </unit> </file> </xliff> #+END_SRC -- Best regards, Kevin Vigouroux

I do not know if I have been able to do this, but although there are some references to LaTeX, I have tried to write a totally independent text, which does not require knowledge of LaTeX or TeX to be understood. El 3/1/21 a las 19:42, BPJ escribió:

This is a great resource which I am at the moment enjoying to read but I can't help wondering if there is a text aimed at those who already know LaTeX and know the basics of TeX describing ConTeXt in terms of differences (and similarities) between the two, and in particular the gotchas.

-- Better --help|less than helpless

Den sön 3 jan. 2021 10:48Joaquín Ataz López mailto:jal@um.es> skrev:

Hello to all:

Two months ago I informed to the list that I had written an introduction in Spanish to ConTeXt Mark IV. This interested several people, and in order to increase their potential audience, a member of this list (native English speaker) has proceeded to translate my text into English.

It is precisely the members of this list who need no introduction at all, but it can sometimes be useful to help someone get started with the fascinating typesetting system that is ConTeXt.

As for the English translation, I have made some small changes to the Spanish version, so anyone who understands Spanish and prefers to read it in its original language can download the new version:

Both versions are available at the following links

- Spanish: https://webs.um.es/jal/docs/introCTX_esp.pdf

- Engilish: https://webs.um.es/jal/docs/introCTX_eng.pdf

Soon I will send both texts, with their source files, to the documentation section of the CTAN repository.

-- Joaquín Ataz López Derecho Civil Universidad de Murcia

___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki     : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

-- Joaquín Ataz López Derecho Civil Universidad de Murcia

Well, there's a document called "LaTeX in proper context", but that's from a different era and nowhere near exhaustive... ________________________________________ Von: ntg-context im Auftrag von BPJ Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. Januar 2021 22:02:22 An: mailing list for ConTeXt users Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] A not so short introduction to ConTeXt Mark IV I understand that and it is all well and good. I am wondering if there already is *another* text which presupposes basic knowledge of TeX and general knowledge of LaTeX, perhaps in a by-topic style. -- Better --help|less than helpless Den sön 3 jan. 2021 20:04Joaquín Ataz López mailto:jal@um.es> skrev: I do not know if I have been able to do this, but although there are some references to LaTeX, I have tried to write a totally independent text, which does not require knowledge of LaTeX or TeX to be understood. El 3/1/21 a las 19:42, BPJ escribió: This is a great resource which I am at the moment enjoying to read but I can't help wondering if there is a text aimed at those who already know LaTeX and know the basics of TeX describing ConTeXt in terms of differences (and similarities) between the two, and in particular the gotchas. -- Better --help|less than helpless Den sön 3 jan. 2021 10:48Joaquín Ataz López mailto:jal@um.es> skrev: Hello to all: Two months ago I informed to the list that I had written an introduction in Spanish to ConTeXt Mark IV. This interested several people, and in order to increase their potential audience, a member of this list (native English speaker) has proceeded to translate my text into English. It is precisely the members of this list who need no introduction at all, but it can sometimes be useful to help someone get started with the fascinating typesetting system that is ConTeXt. As for the English translation, I have made some small changes to the Spanish version, so anyone who understands Spanish and prefers to read it in its original language can download the new version: Both versions are available at the following links - Spanish: https://webs.um.es/jal/docs/introCTX_esp.pdf - Engilish: https://webs.um.es/jal/docs/introCTX_eng.pdf Soon I will send both texts, with their source files, to the documentation section of the CTAN repository. -- Joaquín Ataz López Derecho Civil Universidad de Murcia ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________ -- Joaquín Ataz López Derecho Civil Universidad de Murcia ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________

On 1/3/2021 10:02 PM, BPJ wrote:

I understand that and it is all well and good. I am wondering if there already is *another* text which presupposes basic knowledge of TeX and general knowledge of LaTeX, perhaps in a by-topic style. I think this relates to the question how someone comes to tex and then to context. Are tex macro packages used alongside and such? Are there 'from word/office to tex' or reverse manuals? What could be a motivation to write one.

So, one way out could be to have some collection of tips / suggestions and turn that into a kind of manual. Something to do by those who make some transition or use alongside. The wiki is the place start with that. So .. up to users. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

I understand all that. I just thought that maybe such resources existed which I didn't know. While as you say the approaches differ it would be nice to have like a FAQ "how do you do what LaTeX package X does in ConTeXt?" I guess that that is what I'm after. Something like a LaTeX <--> ConTeXt Rosetta stone. Knowing that rather than importing a package I should modify some command using some options is basic; what one really needs to know is which specific command to modify using which specific options with which specific values to do what package X does in LaTeX. If/since it doesn't exist maybe it would be a good thing if users make it exist. It would certainly help drawing more proselytes. I'm basically still using only LaTeX because I know which packages to use to do the things I want. Perhaps that *is* as good a reason as any to stay with LaTeX but it shouldn't be a barrier to learning ConTeXt which IME it is. To take but one example: when wearing my linguist hat I deal with obscure scripts and languages, mostly dead languages, which no standard LaTeX index processor can handle (at least not out of the box) so I have my pile of Perl hacks which generate indices using Perl's excellent Unicode capabilities and some excellent modules written by other people. (I use the same LaTeX packages as everyone else, I just have a homemade way of going from idx to ind.) The first hurdle to know if/how ConTeXt might offer a better solution (which it doesn't AFAIK but my own tool can easily generate ConTeXt markup as well as LaTeX markup should it come to that) was to find out that indices are called "registers" in ConTeXt (not too surprising since it is _register_ in Swedish) for searching for "index" on the ConTeXt wiki finds an error page! Admittedly it might be just me: I have a hard time knowing where to look in the likewise excellent Vim documentation too: what search terms to use. Finding a LaTeX solution to a problem with Google OTOH usually is pretty fast done — if you can describe your problem in prose you usually don't hit a wall. With knowledge of TeX basics I did not mean a working knowledge of plain TeX but the actual basics: reserved characters, syntax, space after a command is ignored, a blank line makes a paragraph, that sort of things which are common to all flavors. -- Better --help|less than helpless Den mån 4 jan. 2021 00:02Henning Hraban Ramm skrev:

...

Am 03.01.2021 um 22:24 schrieb Hans Hagen :

On 1/3/2021 10:02 PM, BPJ wrote:

...

I understand that and it is all well and good. I am wondering if there already is *another* text which presupposes basic knowledge of TeX and general knowledge of LaTeX, perhaps in a by-topic style. I think this relates to the question how someone comes to tex and then to context. Are tex macro packages used alongside and such? Are there 'from word/office to tex' or reverse manuals? What could be a motivation to write one.

I guess most ConTeXt users migrated from LaTeX at some point, so that guide would really make sense. But I can’t write it either, even if I’m also working with LaTeX (but just as a user of one special class).

If I run into a problem in LaTeX that I know to solve in ConTeXt, the approach is never right.

I think the similarities of LaTeX and ConTeXt are mostly misleading, you’re better off trying to forget everything and start anew.

In LaTeX most problems are solved with “use this or that package”, without the need to understand the commands and settings involved, while in ConTeXt most problems are solved with \setupsomething[somekey=somevalue].

Of course it helps to understand basic TeX stuff – but you’re not supposed to use (plain) TeX commands in LaTeX, while it is or was much more usual in ConTeXt.

Writing my book I have users of text processors (Word/LibreOffice) and layout applications (InDesign etc.) in mind, even if I assume that most readers (if I’ll ever publish it...) will come from LaTeX.

...

So, one way out could be to have some collection of tips / suggestions and turn that into a kind of manual. Something to do by those who make some transition or use alongside. The wiki is the place start with that.

So .. up to users.

Yes, and that means: up to users migrating from LaTeX and documenting their struggles.

Hraban

___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net

___________________________________________________________________________________

On 1/4/2021 2:02 PM, BPJ wrote:

I understand all that. I just thought that maybe such resources existed which I didn't know.

While as you say the approaches differ it would be nice to have like a FAQ "how do you do what LaTeX package X does in ConTeXt?" I guess that that is what I'm after. Something like a LaTeX <--> ConTeXt Rosetta stone. Knowing that rather than importing a package I should modify some command using some options is basic; what one really needs to know is which specific command to modify using which specific options with which specific values to do what package X does in LaTeX. If/since it doesn't exist maybe it would be a good thing if users make it exist. It would certainly help drawing more proselytes. I'm basically still using only LaTeX because I know which packages to use to do the things I want. Perhaps that *is* as good a reason as any to stay with LaTeX but it shouldn't be a barrier to learning ConTeXt which IME it is.

Often it's better to start from scratch as it might be that the choice for some solution in one system would be a different one in an other. I never had to use an office application (word, open office, whatever) but I'm pretty sure that if one comes from a tex mindset one also looks for the wrong solutions. (Which probably is why one can sometimes find those useless ramblings about msword and such among texies: an even little able user of some word processors knows how to write a letter and probably could not get it done in tex in a minute, after all it starts with installation.) So, I wonder if recipes would work well. (Just like switching from say lisp to pascal, or even lisp to prolog, or pascal to c# is not a matter of reading a few page manual.)

To take but one example: when wearing my linguist hat I deal with obscure scripts and languages, mostly dead languages, which no standard LaTeX index processor can handle (at least not out of the box) so I have my pile of Perl hacks which generate indices using Perl's excellent Unicode capabilities and some excellent modules written by other people. (I use the same LaTeX packages as everyone else, I just have a homemade way of going from idx to ind.) The first hurdle to know if/how ConTeXt might offer a better solution (which it doesn't AFAIK but my own tool can easily generate ConTeXt markup as well as LaTeX markup should it come to that) was to find out that indices are called "registers" in ConTeXt (not too surprising since it is _register_ in Swedish) for searching for "index" on the ConTeXt wiki finds an error page!

Sure, but when such specialization is needed, any (transition) manual is kind of tricky. If systems are indeed quite different (and there are definitely conceptual diferences between latex and context and plain) it might even be a reason not to look further. That said: there is some info on how to set up the sorter for different languages.

Admittedly it might be just me: I have a hard time knowing where to look in the likewise excellent Vim documentation too: what search terms to use. Finding a LaTeX solution to a problem with Google OTOH usually is pretty fast done — if you can describe your problem in prose you usually don't hit a wall.

The good news is that often on this list you get an answer (and sometimes looking at examples in e.g. the test suite also helps). But one aspect remains: learning (any) tex takes time. This is compensated by the fact that you can use it forever as it's unlike to stay (or taken over by some large company that then ditches it in favour of its own stuff). Unlearning probably also takes soem time and effort. And in context one also can be triggered into leanring metapost and lua so that adds to the burden (but also fun).

With knowledge of TeX basics I did not mean a working knowledge of plain TeX but the actual basics: reserved characters, syntax, space after a command is ignored, a blank line makes a paragraph, that sort of things which are common to all flavors.

It definitely helps to have an idea how tex deals with what you input and even how it internally works a bit. Just try to get a copy of TeX by Topic ... a pretty good summary of the basics. And after that the TeX Book ... just to get the feelling of what world one enters. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

On 5/1/21 12:02 am, BPJ wrote:

With knowledge of TeX basics I did not mean a working knowledge of plain TeX but the actual basics: reserved characters, syntax, space after a command is ignored, a blank line makes a paragraph, that sort of things which are common to all flavors.

This is where someone might find Joaquin's Introduction to ConTeXt most helpful. Julian

On 1/4/2021 2:18 PM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:

...

Of course it helps to understand basic TeX stuff – but you’re not supposed to use (plain) TeX commands in LaTeX, while it is or was much more usual in ConTeXt.

Well we discourage the use of plain commands to avoid that new users trip over bewildering errors from stuff like "abc \hskip 2cm plus cde", but it is not forbidden to use them. Hm, \hskip is not a plain command but a language primitive. And there's nothing wrong with using primitives, assuming that one knows how they work (and in this case that a \relax does wonders).

One of those 'persistent' wrong ideas about context is that it somehow is kind of plain but decided to not waste time arguing that. There are actually not that many commands in 'plain' anyway. Much of plain tex is setting up math (and all macro packages support those symbolic names and the basic math structures), some fonts (all macro package set up some font system and maybe some aliases that make it easier for plain users), but as soon as one uses latex or context or ... some different output routine kicks in, table mechanisms show up, \item has a different meaning, etc. (The early macro packages were kind of plain themselves: demanding redefinition of internals and such.) Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------

Really? I wouldn't see it this way. I wondered a bit about the number of primitives shown in the document of Joaquín, but that they are used certainly doesn't make context like plaintex.

I have calculated the number of primitives from the list made in "TeX Reference Manual" by David Bausum (of which there is a web version at https://www.tug.org/utilities/plain/cseq.html). According to that text the number of primitives is exactly 326. In my document I rounded it to "approximately 300". -- Joaquín Ataz López Derecho Civil Universidad de Murcia

Am 04.01.2021 um 15:30 schrieb Hans Hagen :

On 1/4/2021 2:18 PM, Ulrike Fischer wrote:

...

...

Of course it helps to understand basic TeX stuff – but you’re not supposed to use (plain) TeX commands in LaTeX, while it is or was much more usual in ConTeXt. Well we discourage the use of plain commands to avoid that new users trip over bewildering errors from stuff like "abc \hskip 2cm plus cde", but it is not forbidden to use them. Hm, \hskip is not a plain command but a language primitive. And there's nothing wrong with using primitives, assuming that one knows how they work (and in this case that a \relax does wonders).

One of those 'persistent' wrong ideas about context is that it somehow is kind of plain but decided to not waste time arguing that. There are actually not that many commands in 'plain' anyway. Much of plain tex is setting up math (and all macro packages support those symbolic names and the basic math structures), some fonts (all macro package set up some font system and maybe some aliases that make it easier for plain users), but as soon as one uses latex or context or ... some different output routine kicks in, table mechanisms show up, \item has a different meaning, etc. (The early macro packages were kind of plain themselves: demanding redefinition of internals and such.)

I don’t know anything about Knuth’s Plain TeX, I always mean plain TeX. ;) And I mix up primitives and "basic" commands, because it doesn’t matter for me. My mistake. What I meant: In ConTeXt code (by users and maybe only in old sources) I see a lot of TeX constructs, e.g. you’re using \def (TeX) and not \define (ConTeXt) because you know it makes no difference. And when I can’t achieve the right vertical spacing with \blank[something], I use \vskip, because it works. LaTeX replaces many basic commands/primitives (\vskip -> \vspace), ConTeXt might too, but with the same name. Hraban

Hi Joaquín, Here is a small suggestion, which would have a few different uses. The following link, which I copied from the index, should take you to the definition of \vbox: https://webs.um.es/jal/docs/introCTX_eng.pdf#%5B%7B%22num%22%3A117%2C%22gen%... This works at least in some browsers, or by passing the stuff after # as a suitable command-line argument to some PDF viewers. So, it would be really nice to make those named destinations stable and readable, for instance https://webs.um.es/jal/docs/introCTX_eng.pdf#vbox I suspect this is either a switch you turn on in ConTeXt, or something that would still need to be implemented as a feature. Best, Augusto On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:00 AM Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:

...

Am 03.01.2021 um 22:24 schrieb Hans Hagen :

...

I understand that and it is all well and good. I am wondering if

On 1/3/2021 10:02 PM, BPJ wrote: there already is *another* text which presupposes basic knowledge of TeX and general knowledge of LaTeX, perhaps in a by-topic style. I think this relates to the question how someone comes to tex and then to context. Are tex macro packages used alongside and such? Are there 'from word/office to tex' or reverse manuals? What could be a motivation to write one.

I guess most ConTeXt users migrated from LaTeX at some point, so that guide would really make sense. But I can’t write it either, even if I’m also working with LaTeX (but just as a user of one special class).

If I run into a problem in LaTeX that I know to solve in ConTeXt, the approach is never right.

I think the similarities of LaTeX and ConTeXt are mostly misleading, you’re better off trying to forget everything and start anew.

In LaTeX most problems are solved with “use this or that package”, without the need to understand the commands and settings involved, while in ConTeXt most problems are solved with \setupsomething[somekey=somevalue].

Of course it helps to understand basic TeX stuff – but you’re not supposed to use (plain) TeX commands in LaTeX, while it is or was much more usual in ConTeXt.

Writing my book I have users of text processors (Word/LibreOffice) and layout applications (InDesign etc.) in mind, even if I assume that most readers (if I’ll ever publish it...) will come from LaTeX.

...

So, one way out could be to have some collection of tips / suggestions and turn that into a kind of manual. Something to do by those who make some transition or use alongside. The wiki is the place start with that.

So .. up to users.

Yes, and that means: up to users migrating from LaTeX and documenting their struggles.

Hraban

___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net

___________________________________________________________________________________