Auto-reply, but a request fro confirmation: Again, it depends in imposition, it seems, isn't it? Without imposition, no probl. Best -a- On 31 Mar 2008, at 11:12, Andrea Valle wrote:

Dear all, I'm having a strange behavior.

I'm using \in to refer to figures, like in the following:

%%%%

La situazione è schematizzata in \in[structure].

\placefigure[][structure]{Struttura di SC.}{\externalfigure[img/ structure][width=.7\textwidth]}%%%% The code has always worked, but this morning the refs in the text are replaced by ?? (while img is correctly displayed, with correct numbering). Any hints? Thanks Best -a- -------------------------------------------------- Andrea Valle -------------------------------------------------- CIRMA - DAMS Università degli Studi di Torino --> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ --> http://www.myspace.com/andreavalle --> andrea.valle@unito.it --------------------------------------------------

" Think of it as seasoning . noise [salt] is boring . F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring . F(noise, blah) can be really tasty " (Ken Perlin on noise)

______________________________________________________________________ _____________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ______________________________________________________________________ _____________

-------------------------------------------------- Andrea Valle -------------------------------------------------- CIRMA - DAMS Università degli Studi di Torino --> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/ --> http://www.myspace.com/andreavalle --> andrea.valle@unito.it -------------------------------------------------- " Think of it as seasoning . noise [salt] is boring . F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring . F(noise, blah) can be really tasty " (Ken Perlin on noise)