Auto-reply, but a request fro confirmation:

Again, it depends in imposition, it seems, isn't it?
Without imposition, no probl.

Best

-a-


On 31 Mar 2008, at 11:12, Andrea Valle wrote:
Dear all, 
I'm having a strange behavior.

I'm using \in to refer to figures, like in the following:

%%%%

La situazione č schematizzata in \in[structure].

\placefigure[][structure]{Struttura di SC.}{\externalfigure[img/structure][width=.7\textwidth]}%%%%
The code has always worked, but this morning the refs in the text are replaced by ?? (while img is correctly displayed, with correct numbering).
Any hints?
Thanks
Best
-a-
--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Universitā degli Studi di Torino
--------------------------------------------------


"
Think of it as seasoning
. noise [salt] is boring
. F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring
. F(noise, blah) can be really tasty
"
(Ken Perlin on noise)





___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Universitā degli Studi di Torino
--------------------------------------------------


"
Think of it as seasoning
. noise [salt] is boring
. F(blah) [food without salt] can be boring
. F(noise, blah) can be really tasty
"
(Ken Perlin on noise)