I would suggest to advertise with the ending another trademark that is not a zero-entropy word in the programming world when not randomly capitalized, and, if possible, that is not an everyday English word either. Mkiv is a good choice for the moment. If there would be no Mkvi and so on, it is good forever. Le lun. 3 févr. 2020 à 23:05, Wolfgang Schuster < wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com> a écrit :
Hans Hagen schrieb am 03.02.2020 um 15:28:
On 2/3/2020 3:07 PM, Philipp A. wrote:
Hi!
Most text editors have LaTeX specific syntax highlighting, so it makes sense to give your ConTeXt file a ending it can be distinguished with. Is there a blessed one?
* .ctx: Would mirror the semi-common .ltx, but is used for XML files inside of ConTeXt itself
context ctx files are xml files indeed
* .mkiv: Is that just for ConTeXt or all LuaTeX stuff? Would it make sense to give text documents that extension?
you can do that (or mkvi or lmtx or ...)
* Something else? (.tex doesn’t count, it’s shared with LaTeX files and plain TeX files) so then use mkiv
Why not just <FILE>.context
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________