I would suggest to advertise with the ending another trademark that is not a zero-entropy word in the programming world when not randomly capitalized, and, if possible, that is not an everyday English word either.

Mkiv is a good choice for the moment. If there would be no Mkvi and so on, it is good forever.

Le lun. 3 févr. 2020 à 23:05, Wolfgang Schuster <wolfgang.schuster.lists@gmail.com> a écrit :

Hans Hagen schrieb am 03.02.2020 um 15:28:
> On 2/3/2020 3:07 PM, Philipp A. wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Most text editors have LaTeX specific syntax highlighting, so it
>> makes sense to give your ConTeXt file a ending it can be
>> distinguished with.
>> Is there a blessed one?
>>
>> * .ctx: Would mirror the semi-common .ltx, but is used for XML files
>>     inside of ConTeXt itself
>
> context ctx files are xml files indeed
>
>> * .mkiv: Is that just for ConTeXt or all LuaTeX stuff? Would it make
>>     sense to give text documents that extension?
>
> you can do that (or mkvi or lmtx or ...)
>
>> * Something else? (.tex doesn’t count, it’s shared with LaTeX files
>>     and plain TeX files)
> so then use mkiv

Why not just <FILE>.context

Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________