![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/386a116d129cdc597f2bb6210bbaff7a.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Marcin Borkowski < mbork@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl> wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisał(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM,
wrote: ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
yes, true.
Not entirely (see below).
please, note: not **all** context peaple (whatever peaple means!) have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX, but **some** context peaple (I, for example, assuming peaple == people ) You are a counter example . So the statement is ** entirely true **.
Also LaTeX peaple always have used to say that LaTeX is better than ConTeXt is true
yes, as before
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that
ConTeXt
has heaps of bugs.
There are some bugs.
As in most software projects. And, that;s true, there _are_ lots of bugs in ConTeXt. But still, it is very usable.
"lots of bug" and "still very usable" are contradictory statemens .
LaTeX rocks...!
true, if you are from LaTeX peaple.
see before .
-- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)
Emacs: Escape-Meta-Alt-Control-Shift.
true . ** entirely true **. ::::||||:::: (^___^) -- luigi