On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Marcin Borkowski
<mbork@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl> wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisał(a):
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, <
vafa@aol.com.au> wrote:
>
> > ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
>
> yes, true.
please, note:
not **all** context peaple (whatever peaple means!)
have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX,
but **some** context peaple (I, for example, assuming peaple == people )
You are a counter example .
So the statement is ** entirely true **.
> Also
> LaTeX peaple always have used to say that LaTeX is better than ConTeXt
> is true
>
yes, as before
>
> >
> > I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt
> > has heaps of bugs.
> >
>
> There are some bugs.
As in most software projects. And, that;s true, there _are_ lots of
bugs in ConTeXt. But still, it is very usable.
"lots of bug" and "still very usable"
are contradictory statemens .
>
>
> >
> > LaTeX rocks...!
>
> true, if you are from LaTeX peaple.
see before .
Emacs: Escape-Meta-Alt-Control-Shift.
true . ** entirely true **.