![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d0e94fb08d4620cfbd2f8f59a7868637.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
31 Jul
2021
31 Jul
'21
4:20 a.m.
I think so too. Especially since the original sender's address isn't included in "reply to all" messages. I think it's an improvement. I have never understood why the original sender needs an additional mail, on top of the one (s)he receives from
On 7/31/21 11:41 AM, Denis Maier via ntg-context wrote: the list. Thomas