Hi all, I am currently typesetting a collection of articles that use a great number of unicodeglyphs from 19 vectors. All the regular glyphs turn up fine, but I am unable to get the bold and italic versions of the glyphs. I have made encoding files for all the vectors using the xsl- scripts from Adam Lindsay and installed them via texfont. The sourcefile is an xml-file with decimal-unicode-entities that are mapped to the \uchar command by the \defineXMLentity command. I have defined the unicode fontsynonyms as follows: <code> \loadmapfile[palatinolinostar_01xx-starling-linostar] \definefontsynonym [UnicodeRegular01] [palatinolinostar_01xx- PalatinoLinoStar] [encoding=palatinolinostar_01xx] \definefontsynonym [UnicodeBold01] [palatinolinostar_01xx- PalatinoLinoStarBold] [encoding=palatinolinostar_01xx] \definefontsynonym [UnicodeItalic01] [palatinolinostar_01xx- PalatinoLinoStarItalic] [encoding=palatinolinostar_01xx] </code> My bodyfontdefinition is as follows: <code> \starttypescript [map] [linostar] [texnansi,palatinolinostar_01xx] \loadmapfile [\typescripttwo-starling-linostar.map] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [serif] [linostar] [texnansi,palatinolinostar_01xx] \definefontsynonym [linostar] [\typescriptthree- PalatinoLinoStar] [encoding=\typescriptthree] \definefontsynonym [linostar-Italic] [\typescriptthree- PalatinoLinoStarItalic] [encoding=\typescriptthree] \definefontsynonym [linostar-Bold] [\typescriptthree- PalatinoLinoStarBold] [encoding=\typescriptthree] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [serif] [linostar] [name] \setups [font:fallback:serif] \definefontsynonym [Serif] [linostar] \definefontsynonym [SerifItalic] [linostar-Italic] \definefontsynonym [SerifBold] [linostar-Bold] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [my] [starling-linostar] [texnansi,palatinolinostar_01xx] \definetypeface [starling-linostar] [rm] [serif] [linostar] [default] [encoding=\typescriptthree] \stoptypescript \usetypescript [my] [starling-linostar] \setupbodyfont[starling-linostar,rm,10pt] </code> Could somebody tell me what I am doing wrong? Kind regards, Sjoerd