Hi all,
I am currently typesetting a collection of articles that use a great number of unicodeglyphs from 19 vectors. All the regular glyphs turn up fine, but I am unable to get the bold and italic versions of the glyphs. I have made encoding files for all the vectors using the xsl-scripts from Adam Lindsay and installed them via texfont.
The sourcefile is an xml-file with decimal-unicode-entities that are mapped to the \uchar command by the \defineXMLentity command.
I have defined the unicode fontsynonyms as follows:
<code>
\loadmapfile[palatinolinostar_01xx-starling-linostar]
\definefontsynonym [UnicodeRegular01] [palatinolinostar_01xx-PalatinoLinoStar] [encoding=palatinolinostar_01xx]
\definefontsynonym [UnicodeBold01] [palatinolinostar_01xx-PalatinoLinoStarBold] [encoding=palatinolinostar_01xx]
\definefontsynonym [UnicodeItalic01] [palatinolinostar_01xx-PalatinoLinoStarItalic] [encoding=palatinolinostar_01xx]
</code>
My bodyfontdefinition is as follows:
<code>
\starttypescript [map] [linostar] [texnansi,palatinolinostar_01xx]
\loadmapfile [\typescripttwo-starling-linostar.map]
\stoptypescript
\starttypescript [serif] [linostar] [texnansi,palatinolinostar_01xx]
\definefontsynonym [linostar] [\typescriptthree-PalatinoLinoStar] [encoding=\typescriptthree]
\definefontsynonym [linostar-Italic] [\typescriptthree-PalatinoLinoStarItalic] [encoding=\typescriptthree]
\definefontsynonym [linostar-Bold] [\typescriptthree-PalatinoLinoStarBold] [encoding=\typescriptthree]
\stoptypescript
\starttypescript [serif] [linostar] [name]
\setups [font:fallback:serif]
\definefontsynonym [Serif] [linostar]
\definefontsynonym [SerifItalic] [linostar-Italic]
\definefontsynonym [SerifBold] [linostar-Bold]
\stoptypescript
\starttypescript [my] [starling-linostar] [texnansi,palatinolinostar_01xx]
\definetypeface [starling-linostar] [rm] [serif] [linostar] [default] [encoding=\typescriptthree]
\stoptypescript
\usetypescript [my] [starling-linostar]
\setupbodyfont[starling-linostar,rm,10pt]
</code>
Could somebody tell me what I am doing wrong?
Kind regards,
Sjoerd