Adam Lindsay wrote:

Vit Zyka said this at Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:34:13 +0100:

The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi.

basically, you declare a variant set for a (Serif/Sans/Mono) family: \definefontvariant [Serif] [exp] [-Expert] % [fam] [call abbrev] [synonym suffix]

Hallo, thanks to Adam, it was easy to implement font variants. A little bit more work was with all Storm glyph deffinition in two (+one) encodings. Before I will do the support for the rest of my Storm font families I want to ask audience (and especially Hans, Adam) to have a look into the files (http://typokvitek.com/tmp/context-storm.zip). Example in http://typokvitek.com/tmp/test-sdynamo.pdf (generaly interesting for all \show... font related command usage). Recommendation for the package improvements are welcomed. There are: enco-st1.tex - ec encoding with storm glyph extension enco-st2.tex - xl2 encoding with storm glyph extension enco-st3.tex - variants (additional glyph) for enco-st1 and enco-st2 type-sdynamo.tex - typescripts for Storm Dynamo font family math-sto.tex - simple mathematics present in Storm fonts (in progress) test-sdynamo.tex - test file test-storm.tex - support for tests Questions: ? During encoding deffinition I found some chracter name mess. I solved it by synonyms: E.g. \definecharacter textdag {\dagger} \definecharacter paragraphmark {\paragraph} \definecharacter textellipsis {\ellipsis} \definecharacter textminus {\minus} \definecharacter ostroke {\oslash} \definecharacter textdollar {\dollar} Is there some context convention for character names? ? I have a problem to define mathematics chars. I did: \starttypescript [math] [dynamoRE] [st1] \definefontsynonym [DynamoRE-Math-Letters] [sdgr8te] [encoding=st1] \definefontsynonym [DynamoRE-Math-Letters-Italic] [sdgri8te] [encoding=st1] \definefontsynonym [DynamoRE-Math-Symbols] [sdgr8te] % \definefontsynonym [DynamoRE-Math-Extension] [] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [math] [dynamoRE] [name] \definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [DynamoRE-Math-Letters] \definefontsynonym [MathItalic] [DynamoRE-Math-Letters-Italic] \definefontsynonym [MathSymbol] [DynamoRE-Math-Symbols] \definefontsynonym [MathExtension] [ComputerModernMath-Extension] \stoptypescript \starttypescript [DynamoRE] [st1,st2] \definetypeface [DynamoRE] [ss] [sans] [dynamoRE] [default] [encoding=\typescripttwo] \definetypeface [DynamoRE] [mm] [math] [dynamoRE] [default] [encoding=\typescripttwo] \stoptypescript \startmathcollection[storm] \definemathcharacter [+] [bin] [sy] ["2B] \definemathcharacter [=] [rel] [sy] ["3B] \stopmathcollection \enablemathcollection[storm] $1+1=2$ But I get error: !Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts. Where is the problem? ? - \starttypescript [*] [fallback] is generaly useful. Is a good idea to move it from large type-buy.tex somewhere else? ? Storm fonts have different accent shapes for lover/upper case letters. Is there some mechanism to distinguish this making the composits? Thank you Vit