[NTG-pdftex] Patch 391: Extending \pdfliteral

Hartmut Henkel hartmut_henkel at gmx.de
Tue Jul 19 00:34:23 CEST 2005


On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Hans Hagen wrote:

> Hartmut Henkel wrote:
> >
> > BT
> > /F1 9.9626 Tf 91.9253 759.9271 Td[(A)]TJ
> > ET
> > q
> > BT
> > /F1 9.9626 Tf 119.3226 759.9271 Td[(Hello)]TJ
> > ET
> > Q
> > BT
> > /F1 9.9626 Tf 99.3973 759.9271 Td[(B)]TJ 204.112 -654.7472 Td[(1)]TJ
> > ET
> >
> > That's what the new "et" option of the appended tiny experimental
> > patch does; it forces an ET if required, but without transform.

> maybe use 'text' instead of 'et'

why "text"? it should _not_ put anything into a text object, so it's
more a "notext". Would be "notext" better than "et"?

> sure; we really need full control over that part (we should also make
> sure that dvipdfmx supports a similar model)

this should be rather easy once it's settled and tested. The \special
stuff is there.

Regards, Hartmut


More information about the ntg-pdftex mailing list