[NTG-pdftex] Extensions: \pdf$foo or \$foo?

Taco Hoekwater taco at elvenkind.com
Sat Jul 2 00:49:36 CEST 2005

Hartmut Henkel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>>Hartmut Henkel wrote:
>>>maybe one could find a way to enable new primitives, so that they
>>>are hidden if not enabled. Maybe removing the primitive name strings
>>>from the hash and keeping them somewhere safe until they are
>>>required? Like \use\match? A little like in Perl...
>>I'm pondering on Hans' \primitive\par notion, which is almost the same
>>idea. After \let\par\undefined, \primitive\par should still execute a
>>\par internal command, so Hans' and your idea seem two facets of the
>>same jewel.
> yes, difference might be that i meant it in the sense that \use\match
> wouldn't execute \match, it would only install it at its destined
> position within the hash (if that's possible at all), so that you from
> then on can call it by a simple \match. (which gets tricky if in the
> meantime a macro with the same name has been defined)

The jewel is to be able to reference a specific internal command,
regardless of the current execution context. I have some ideas on
how this could be done, but I still need some time to think it
through. I'll post an initial proposal soon, I hope.


More information about the ntg-pdftex mailing list