[NTG-pdftex] unbuffered vs. buffered terminal output
jackos1 at poczta.onet.pl
Fri Dec 23 10:07:17 CET 2005
>>> following trivial observation i made (several runs)[...]
>>> Has anybody similar statistics?
>> Just another trivial observation, that in dosish os displaying is even
>> more expensive.
> hm, not in a windows shell; it depends on the font you use!
well, yes, it depends on the font, but even for the simplest raster font
the windowish terminal (cmd, not custom shell I use) still seems to be
slower. but ok, i thought it is obvious, if not, further tests are to be
P.Jackowski at gust.org.pl
More information about the ntg-pdftex