[NTG-context] Numbering in mathalignment not working
mickep at gmail.com
Wed May 25 06:38:54 CEST 2022
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 5:35 AM Luis Montgomery via ntg-context
<ntg-context at ntg.nl> wrote:
> Same issue with
> \NC A_1 x + B_1 y + C_1\NC = 0 \NR[+]
> \NC A_2 x + B_2 y + C_2\NC = 0 \NR[+]
> and with all the wiki examples on \startmathalignment (https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/_startmathalignment).
> L. Montgomery
> El dom, 22 may 2022 a las 0:14, śrīrāma via ntg-context (<ntg-context at ntg.nl>) escribió:
>> On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > [I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
>> > I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or
>> > there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside
>> > mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even if
>> > multiple are requested.
>> > The following example does not produce the expected result
>> > both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
>> > \starttext
>> > \placeformula
>> > \startformula
>> > \startmathalignment
>> > \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
>> > \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
>> > \stopmathalignment
>> > \stopformula
>> > \stoptext
>> > Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not work
>> > as expected. Has its behaviour changed?
>> > [...]
>> Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has any
>> workaround for the issue I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I
>> unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I am
>> stuck with documents without equation numbers.
>> As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first
>> equation is numbered (while both should be)
>> \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
>> \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
>> I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail.
It has been fixed, but we have to wait for the next upload.
More information about the ntg-context