[NTG-context] Numbering in mathalignment not working
monty.luis at gmail.com
Wed May 25 05:34:50 CEST 2022
Same issue with
\NC A_1 x + B_1 y + C_1\NC = 0 \NR[+]
\NC A_2 x + B_2 y + C_2\NC = 0 \NR[+]
and with all the wiki examples on \startmathalignment (
El dom, 22 may 2022 a las 0:14, śrīrāma via ntg-context (<ntg-context at ntg.nl>)
> On 5/19/22 2:04 PM śrīrāma wrote:
> > Hi,
> > [I am on version 2022.05.11 11:36]
> > I think either a bug might have crept into one of the recent uploads or
> > there is some change in behaviour – numbering of statements inside
> > mathalignment blocks is not working: only one statement is numbered even
> > multiple are requested.
> > The following example does not produce the expected result
> > both the equations should be numbered when only the first one is –
> > \starttext
> > \placeformula
> > \startformula
> > \startmathalignment
> > \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
> > \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
> > \stopmathalignment
> > \stopformula
> > \stoptext
> > Also the [+] options and the second optional argument of \NR does not
> > as expected. Has its behaviour changed?
> > [...]
> Sorry to bother you all during a weekend but I am wondering if anyone has
> workaround for the issue I have asked about above: while updating LMTX I
> unwittingly replaced my previous version without retaining a copy. Now I
> stuck with documents without equation numbers.
> As stated above the following MWE demonstrates the issue: only the first
> equation is numbered (while both should be)
> \NC a \NC = b \NR[eq:one]
> \NC c \NC = d \NR[eq:two]
> I tried to look into math-ini and math-ali but to no avail.
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
> maillist : ntg-context at ntg.nl /
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ntg-context