[NTG-context] The odd semantics of \begincsname

Hans Hagen j.hagen at xs4all.nl
Sat Aug 17 10:48:18 CEST 2019

On 8/17/2019 9:19 AM, Henri Menke wrote:
> Dear list,
> According to the LuaTeX documentation:
>      “The \begincsname primitive is like \csname but doesn’t create a
>      relaxed equivalent when there is no such name.”
> I thought it would be possible to use this fact to skip the \relax-ed
> definition when \def-ining a new control sequence, but the following MWE
> fails with \inaccessible:
>      \expandafter\gdef\csname yes\endcsname{}
>      \expandafter\gdef\begincsname no\endcsname{}
>      \bye
> Is this a bug or is this behaviour intended?  Could this be fixed by
> making manufacture_csname aware whether it is in a def_cmd context or
> not?
[sorry to those who are not interested in these low level issues, just skip]

intended ... it expands to basically nothing so you get no token 
representing a 'name' after the gdef .. the expansion is pushed in from 
of whatever comes next (which could be another \expandafter for instance)

you suggest that if \begincsname could behave differently when it's 
after a \def, \gdef, (and then quite some more definition related 
commands), it could behave differently but it not an option

for instance (as mentioned) there can be more than one expansion going 
on after these define commands, like expanding a macro that itself 
expands to \csname so one has several \expandafters before the gdef 
then); there is actually no looking back in scanning tokens unless a 
token has been scanned already and looking forward would involve 
expansion so a circular mess

an option could be not to push something on the save stack (a side 
effect of creating the csname, which has a little impact on performance 
and nesting) but removing that bit might give other side effects (e.g. 
for successive reassignments inside a group, maybe even mixed local and 
global); i did a quick test with that and it gives quite incompatible 
output in ConTeXt so that's definitely a no-go (adding all kind fo 
saveguards and checks in the engine doesn't pay off, especially not for 
something that never was a problem)

some time ago i considered a convenience command \[e]defcsname, as it 
saves a few tokens (no gain in performance as all the related things 
still need to happen); but even that one would probably create the name 
in the same way

so ... this is the way it is ... (i must admit that it never gave me any 
issues so whatever triggered the question, there's probbaly a way around 


                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl

More information about the ntg-context mailing list