[NTG-context] final thoughts on experiments with lua

Hans Hagen j.hagen at xs4all.nl
Thu Jan 10 01:09:51 CET 2019

On 1/9/2019 9:38 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 20:57:21 +0100
> "Thomas A. Schmitz" <thomas.schmitz at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>> 3. Lua's handling of tables is very efficient and fast. For analyzing my
>> Greek texts, I have to use huge tables for morphological parsing, with
>> more than 900,000 entries. Looking up words in these tables is around 3x
>> faster in Lua than in python!
> I have found, in my limited use (and understanding) of lua for data analysis is that it is indeed VERY fast, and not only beats python without comparison, it also handles quite large data sets without choking.

and with a bit op optimization one can often squeeze out more

> It has become fashionable to use hardware GPUs to speed-up parallel calculation tasks, and this is now often done using libraries having python bindings. I wonder if python becomes the limiting factor in those applications?

                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl

More information about the ntg-context mailing list