[NTG-context] Ideas for improving documentation of ConTeXt

Henning Hraban Ramm texml at fiee.net
Tue Oct 11 22:40:44 CEST 2016


Am 2016-10-11 um 22:26 schrieb Jonas Baggett <jonasb at tranquille.ch>:

>> http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/328667/new-tags-and-documentation-beta
> 
> And a ConTeXt tag must already exist on Stack Overflow, which I didn't find. So it seems we can wait a while before there would be examples in ConTeXt.

There are ConTeXt threads on tex.stackexchange.com

> I find stackoverflow too elitist, once I was reading a question and I wanted to help with an answer but it wasn't possible to do because it was the first time I wanted to contribute in stackoverflow and of course I was lacking the needed reputation. I am interested to help when I see an occasion to and when I am in the mood for that ;-). So I found that frustrating and it didn't make me interested to contribute there.
> 
> On the other hand, I understand their will to have good quality questions and answer and I appreciate that. I am just feeling it must be a better way to do that.

Hm, in my experience you get the necessary basic permissions really soon.

Greetlings, Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)
GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD



More information about the ntg-context mailing list