[NTG-context] [dante-ev] Kooperation mit der PDF Association
context at boede.nl
Thu Apr 21 21:34:26 CEST 2016
I suppose that it is fine that Dante is a member of that association. We will lift on their possibilities to fetch info and being involved with it. I think, that the ConTeXt group as such has little to profit from a membership…
> On 21 apr. 2016, at 20:15, Mojca Miklavec <mojca.miklavec.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 April 2016 at 19:24, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 4/21/2016 6:28 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>>> Hello ConTeXt group activists!
>>> DANTE just became a partner organization of PDF association, see message
>>> Wouldn’t it make sense for our group (and NTG and TUG etc.) to do the
>> I suppose that Dante, the largest tex user group being around, being a
>> member of that group means that the rest of the user groups can save
>> themselves the trouble and money ...
> The website says:
> "Non-profit organizations can become members without charge as
> Partner Organizations."
> So maybe the ConTeXt Group could indeed apply for membership?
> If we would have to pay the fee, there is no way we could afford it anyway.
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
> maillist : ntg-context at ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
More information about the ntg-context