[NTG-context] two issues with interactive hyperlinks (please comment)
alan.braslau at cea.fr
Mon Feb 22 21:40:42 CET 2016
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:13:27 +0100
Hans Hagen <pragma at wxs.nl> wrote:
> btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should
> make two versions, one for screen, one for print) and footnotes
> should be pop ups or roll-overs but the free acrobat alternatives are
> not clever enough for that
As Pablo wrote, this just won't happen.
It is very rare that *anyone* delivers both screen and print versions
of a PDF file (Pragma ADE excepted).
This makes me think: Is there some "standard" way for a PDF to contain
I did struggle recently with an Adobe-specific PDF (which I could not
even read using Acroread 9) that contained two, in fact three,
1. A form
3. A page that was shown on non-Adobe readers
I do not know enough about PDF and different readers to know how to
include several versions, but this would be quite useful.
More information about the ntg-context