[NTG-context] TeX in \xmlsetentity and DTDs in DOCTYPEs

Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl
Mon Jan 18 20:13:08 CET 2016

On 1/18/2016 5:22 PM, Kate F wrote:
> On 18 January 2016 at 13:30, Thomas A. Schmitz
> <thomas.schmitz at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
>> On 01/17/2016 07:24 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> it should work in the in beta now
>> Hi Hans,
>> now I have a problem :-) What should take precedence if an entity is both
>> defined in the dtd and as a \xmltexentity? The way I see it, the latter:
>> e.g., in the DTD, I might declare something for use in a browser but require
>> a different solution when typesetting with ConTeXt. The latest and greatest
>> now takes my DTD definitions instead of the \xmltexentities, which did not
>> happen before. Is that an unwanted side effect or the new default?
> Ah, there's a bug:
>      <!ENTITY i.opt "<option>-i</option>">
> This should produce an <option> node in the DOM tree, just as if you'd
> typed that out where the entity is used. Currently ConTeXt takes that
> as literal text, as if you'd typed "<option>-i<option/>"
> Often I wish XML weren't so complex...

are you sure? i've never seen that


                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
       tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl

More information about the ntg-context mailing list