[NTG-context] r2l alignment and linenumbering conflict?

Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد Idris.Hamid at colostate.edu
Mon Aug 3 17:42:24 CEST 2015


Hi Hans,

On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:13:34 -0600, Hans Hagen <pragma at wxs.nl> wrote:

> On 8/3/2015 4:56 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>> what would be the proper name for such a conversion? simplearabic?
>> arabicdigits?
>>
>>> [myconversion]
>>> [١,٢,٣,٤,٥,٦,٧,٨,٩,١٠,
>>> ١١,١٢,١٣,١٤,١٥,١٦,١٧,١٨,١٩,٢٠,
>>> ۲۱,۲۲,۲۳,۲٤,۲٥,۲٦,۲۷,۲۸,۲۹,۳۰,
>>  > another million entries
>
> the next beta will have:
>
> \setuplinenumbering[conversion=arabicdecimals]

What's wrong with 'persiannumerals' and 'arabicnumerals' which we had  
before? They are not supposed to by synonymous for abjadnumerals... In any  
case we need

U+: [0030-0039] -> [0660-0669]: arabicdecimals
U+: [0030-0039] -> [06F0-06F9]: persiandecimals

Best wishes
Idris
-- 
Idris Samawi Hamid
Professor of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523


More information about the ntg-context mailing list