[NTG-context] position of qed symbol in proofs

Mikael P. Sundqvist mickep at gmail.com
Tue Nov 11 14:55:41 CET 2014

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Otared Kavian <otared at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10 Nov 2014, at 10:58, Hans Hagen <pragma at wxs.nl> wrote:
>> […]
>> i'm not surprised: eqno only works in a formula and closecommand is not in the formula ... it would not align properly anyway
> Oh… I see.
> So there is not anymore the possibility to finish an enumeration (such as « proof » ine Mikael’s example) with aformula and automatically get the square of qed on the right? This was possible for quite a long time, although personnally I have used it seldom.
> Thanks and best regards: OK
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
> maillist : ntg-context at ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________

OK, so I will put the square there by hand from now on.

Best regards, Mikael

More information about the ntg-context mailing list