[NTG-context] position of qed symbol in proofs

Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl
Mon Nov 10 10:08:33 CET 2014


On 11/10/2014 6:54 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
>
> Actually I just tried your example with the ConTeXt version on TeX Live, as well as with a copy dating back to 2014-02-14, and both behaved in the same wrong way regarding the closesymbol and closecommand. So in
>
> \setupenumeration[proof]
> 	[number=no,
> 	closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
> 	closecommand=\ifmmode\eqno\else\wordright\fi]
>
> the \ifmmode is not honoured, and the change must have happened quite earlier than a few weeks.
>
> Maybe we should open a new thread as a bug in closecommand?

it probably has to do with the if test and some checking on 'command' ...

\defineenumeration
   [proof]
   [number=no,
    closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},
    closecommand=\mathortext\eqno\wordright]


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------


More information about the ntg-context mailing list