[NTG-context] position of qed symbol in proofs
otared at gmail.com
Sat Nov 8 17:43:47 CET 2014
In my files I have the following which used to work, but it doesn’t work as expected anymore, as you point out
This is a simple proof.
This is another simple proof that ends with a formula
I don’t know when the change occurred, but at least it worked last year (which for ConTeXt means pregistoric times… :—).
As a temporary hack one can always say:
Best regards: OK
> On 08 Nov 2014, at 14:40, Mikael P. Sundqvist <mickep at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist <mickep at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I once used
>> This is a simple proof.
>> This is another simple proof that ends with a formula
>> to get the \square at the end of proofs, and it worked out well. But
>> with the latest beta (and some previous one(s)), the \square is not
>> placed at the same line as the formula in the second example. Is it
>> broken? Or is there a new syntax?
>> PDF with my result is attached.
>> Best regards, Mikael
> I don't like to bump, but... Noone else has this problem?
> @Hans: Is it easily fixed?
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
> maillist : ntg-context at ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
More information about the ntg-context