# [NTG-context] example of better linebreak with 2014.05.17 compared to 2014.07.07

Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl
Wed Jul 9 15:45:42 CEST 2014

On 7/9/2014 12:39 PM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> Out of curiosity and as a ConTeXt stress test, I installed 2014.07.07
> MkIV and recompiled my book with it, and looked at the pixel-by-pixel
> comparison between it and the version compiled with 2014.05.17.
>
> There were many changes.  I am going through them one at a time in case
> any could be bugs in luatex or context.  (I noticed several good changes
> where pages fit more precisely into their height.)
>
> Here is a change that might be a bug.  It uses the following minimal
> example:
>
> \setupbodyfont[palatino]
> \showframe
> \setuplayout[width=5.4286in]
>
> \starttext
>
> Let's see whether this estimate is reasonable.  According to the
> plane's technical documentation, the 747-400's four engines together
> can provide roughly 1~meganewton of thrust.
>
> \stoptext
>
> With 2014.05.17, the linebreaks are as follows, with no overfull boxes:
>
>    Let's see whether this estimate is reasonable. According to the plane's
>    technical documentation, the 747-400's four engines together can provide
>    roughly 1 meganewton of thrust.
>
> With 2014.07.07, the linebreaks are as follows, but with an overfull box:
>
>    Let's see whether this estimate is reasonable. According to the plane's tech-
>    nical documentation, the 747-400's four engines together can provide roughly
>    1 meganewton of thrust.
>
> The "roughly" on the second line protrudes a good way into the margin.
>  From the log file:
>
>    Overfull \hbox (8.80678pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 7--10
>    \3>palatino-12pt-rm-tf-0--0 ni-cal doc-u-men-ta-tion, the 747-400’s four en-gines to-gether can pro-vide roughly
>
> Both runs use luatex 0.79.1 (svn rev 5033), which I compiled by hand and
> then did 'context --make' to regenerate the formats.
>
> Is this change in linebreaking intended, or could it be an unintended
> consequence of another change (and therefore maybe problematic)?

it can happen if patterns or fonts changed ...so, best make two small
test files and we can look into it with tracing

> Perhaps related, the PDF files behave differently with copying and
> pasting.  Copying the paragraph from the 2014.05.17 file, I get spaces
> between the words.  Copying from the 2014.07.07 file, I get no spaces
> between the words (using mupdf).  (The difference may be due to the
> smaller interword spaces, whose size may have fallen below a threshold
> that mupdf uses.)
>
> I've attached the uncompressed PDFs (each about 14K).

how does the tex file look

-----------------------------------------------------------------