[NTG-context] [OT] Typographical quality of various engines

luigi scarso luigi.scarso at gmail.com
Thu May 15 20:38:45 CEST 2014


On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Jan Tosovsky <j.tosovsky at email.cz> wrote:

> On 2014-05-15 luigi scarso wrote:
> > On 5/14/2014 10:21 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> > >
> > > I've finished a rough comparision of various engines for
> > > their typographical quality: http://drifted.in/publishing/
> >
> > Another point could be the "server" property... the swiglib project is
> > an attempt to cover this side
> >
> > https://swiglib.foundry.supelec.fr/
>
> I am sad seeing lot of technical details without single sentence covering
> benefits for the end user...
>
> It depends on the "end user" term.
It's the other side of digital typography: high speed of "low quality" jobs,
where the core  is the automatic workflow and the "end user" is often a
"traditional programmer" .



-- 
luigi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/attachments/20140515/451ebd6f/attachment.html>


More information about the ntg-context mailing list