[NTG-context] luatex or luajittex?

Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jan 7 20:36:51 CET 2014

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 07:24 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On 01/06/2014 10:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>> On 1/6/2014 9:29 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> Which one is preferable: luatex or luajittex?
>>>> both should work although at some point we will move on to > 0.77
>>>> specific functionality
>>>> there will be a luajittex 0.78.1 soon (there is already a binary for
>>>> windows, as Akira always provides the latest greatest)
>>> I have just updated the ConTeXt Suite (for Linux) and luajittex seems to
>>> be broken.
>> Which one? 32-bit or 64-bit linux (linux or linux-64)?
> Linux 32-bits is my architecture.
>> I failed to automatically compile 32-bit binaries (and I would have to
>> remember how to switch the compiler and simply didn't care enough at
>> the time to take the effort + we have problems with weirdly
>> misbehaving subversion without proper understanding what could go
>> wrong, so some binary builders weren't even able to submit their
>> binaries). If that fails it might be due to version mismatch which
>> means that I need to build the binary first.
> I guess the version mismatch might cause the issue.

Please try again. (Or at least I hope that the new binary has
proliferated to the distribution already.)


More information about the ntg-context mailing list