[NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?

Thomas A. Schmitz thomas.schmitz at uni-bonn.de
Fri May 11 14:10:25 CEST 2012

On 05/11/2012 01:28 PM, Peter Schorsch wrote:
> Hi,
> I "reactivated" some code that was working a year ago. But now it seems
> that \expanded has no effect in my case (see below). I also tried it
> with \normalexpanded and \expandedafter but both had also no effect. My
> problem seems to be this line of the full example below:
> 	\doifsomething\Paragraphmark{\expanded{\textreference[\Paragraphmark]{\fullheadnumber/\rawnumber[ParagraphNumber]}}}%
> The error shows itself in the line:
> 	Should be 1/1: \in[test]
> As \in[test] gives me 1/3 instead of 1/1. (1 was the number assigned to
> the first paragraph - 3 is the acutal number).
> Can someone tell me what I need to change?
> Thanks in advanced
> P.

See this thread: 

and try to construct a "minimal example" next time.


More information about the ntg-context mailing list