[NTG-context] referenceformat MkIV

Yury G. Kudryashov urkud at ya.ru
Mon May 31 21:34:23 CEST 2010


taco wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>>> It seems that \ineq doesn't clear some variables, and the next \in uses
>>> the previous format.
>> Please, apply the attached patch upstream. It fixed the problem for me.
> This problem was already fixed in the latest (internal?) beta.
I shall test once this beta will be published.
>> Another problem fixed by my patch:
>> 
>> \definereferenceformat[ineq][text=equation]
>> \starttext
>> \placeformula[first]
>> \startformula 1=1\stopformula
>> \ineq[first]
>> \stoptext
>> printed "1", not "equation 1".
> 
> This problem is still there and needs fixing, but I think your patch
> has a bug (possibly because of the already done other bugfix).
> 
> After patching, I think \doinatreferenceone should look like
> this:
> 
> \def\doinatreferenceone
>    {\ifx\next\bgroup
>       \afterassignment\doinatreferenceonetwo
>       \expandafter\leftreferencetoks
>     \else\ifx\textofreference\empty
>       \leftreferencetoks\emptytoks
>       \expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\dodoinatreferencenone
>     \else
>       \leftreferencetoks{\textofreference}%
>       \expandafter\expandafter\expandafter\doinatreferenceonetwo
>     \fi\fi}
With published beta, I didn't need these \expandafter, but probably I missed 
some corner case, or they're needed with your internal fix.



More information about the ntg-context mailing list