[NTG-context] 10+ reasons why I still use MKII
Taco Hoekwater
taco at elvenkind.com
Wed May 12 17:45:00 CEST 2010
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>>> 10.) Different square root shape/variant used:
>>>>
>>>> $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}$
>>>>
>>>> Original formula:
>>>> \startformula
>>>> \startcases
>>>> \NC ρ_0, \NC for $i=0$, \NR
>>>> \NC ρ_i\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{2πσ_i^2}}
>>>> \exp\biggl(-\frac{\left(x_j-μ_i\right)^2}{2σ_i^2}\biggr), \NC for
>>>> $i\in\left\{1,2\right\}$. \NR
>>>> \stopcases
>>>> \stopformula
>>>> but I cannot reproduce the big difference it makes in original
>>>> document on a smaller scale.
>>>
>>> Taco, is there a difference between the default math parameters for
>>> MkIV?
>>
>> Hans now uses OpenType Math (sometimes faked) fonts always, and his
>> initial version of the reimplemenation of \big.... was wrong. But
>> I thought this had been fixed a few weeks ago.
>
> I am using a month old version. I'll update and check again.
>
> Mojca's question was regarding the shape of \sqrt.
Ah yes. Same problem, different glyph.
Best wishes,
Taco
More information about the ntg-context
mailing list