[NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

Denis Bitouzé dbitouze at wanadoo.fr
Thu Apr 22 19:09:31 CEST 2010


Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 16h51,
Denis Bitouzé <dbitouze at wanadoo.fr> a écrit :

> But the following MCE:
> 
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en}
> \begin{document}
> \startchemical
> \chemical[2H_2,PLUS,O_2,GIVES,2H_2O]
> \stopchemical
> \end{document}
> 
> leads to the messages:
> [...]

Well, the following one:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en}
\begin{document}
\chemical{2H_2,PLUS,O_2,GIVES,2H_2O}
\end{document}

is actually OK!

What is strange is that ppchtex \chemical formulas used to be inserted
between \startchemical and \stopchemical... Moreover, the following:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en}
\begin{document}
\startchemical
  \chemical[SIX,B,R,RZ][1,2,3,4,5,6]
\stopchemical
\end{document}

works only with \startchemical and \stopchemical.

Are those changes: 

  1. {}{} rather than [][],

  2. pair \startchemical, \stopchemical or not,

  3. etc.

documented somewhere?

Thanks.
-- 
Denis




More information about the ntg-context mailing list