taco at elvenkind.com
Thu Aug 3 15:45:05 CEST 2006
wwl at musensturm.de wrote:
>>>Same batch file, so yes.
>>>It would be possible to convert the batch file into a perl or
>>>scripts plus a one-line batch that starts the interpreter +
> aren't you shutting with 'Kanonen auf Spatzen'?
Perhaps, but the advantage is that you don't have to aim :-)
> I have running the standalone-context here on WindowsME.
> I have modifyed the original batch-files a bit
If the batch file is still functionally equivalent, it would
make sense to include it in the distribution. I vaguely recall
that I had removed all of the 'smart' stuff from the batch
file to please command.com, making it much less functional,
but perhaps that is more an indication of how well I know
More information about the ntg-context