[NTG-context] strange stretching with \blank[...]
taco at elvenkind.com
Sun Jan 15 15:53:57 CET 2006
Peter Münster wrote:
> But \blank[big,big] is working right.
> It seems, that we should replace all "2*big" by "big,big" in core-sec.tex
I regard this a bug in the definition of 2*big. I'm not sure
how many old documents will break if it is fixed, though. The
correct definition is:
The current definition is:
but that does not copy the stretch and shrink parts.
TeX is a bit stupid come to skip assignments, after
\skip0=5pt plus 10pt minus 10pt
\skip0 will be *exactly* 10pt, without any glue components.
More information about the ntg-context