[NTG-context] iso latin 2 ; storm fonts
Vit Zyka
vit.zyka at seznam.cz
Tue Mar 15 19:23:05 CET 2005
> Adam Lindsay wrote:
>
>> Vit Zyka said this at Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:34:13 +0100:
>>
>>> The question is how to elegantly switch from standard (st2) tfm to
>>> extended (st3) tfm when the glyph is not present in st2 - with
>>> preserving \rm, \bf, \it, \bi.
>>
>> basically, you declare a variant set for a (Serif/Sans/Mono) family:
>> \definefontvariant [Serif] [exp] [-Expert]
>> % [fam] [call abbrev] [synonym suffix]
Hallo,
thanks to Adam, it was easy to implement font variants. A little bit
more work was with all Storm glyph deffinition in two (+one) encodings.
Before I will do the support for the rest of my Storm font families I
want to ask audience (and especially Hans, Adam) to have a look into the
files (http://typokvitek.com/tmp/context-storm.zip). Example in
http://typokvitek.com/tmp/test-sdynamo.pdf (generaly interesting for all
\show... font related command usage). Recommendation for the package
improvements are welcomed.
There are:
enco-st1.tex - ec encoding with storm glyph extension
enco-st2.tex - xl2 encoding with storm glyph extension
enco-st3.tex - variants (additional glyph) for enco-st1 and enco-st2
type-sdynamo.tex - typescripts for Storm Dynamo font family
math-sto.tex - simple mathematics present in Storm fonts (in progress)
test-sdynamo.tex - test file
test-storm.tex - support for tests
Questions:
? During encoding deffinition I found some chracter name mess. I solved
it by synonyms:
E.g. \definecharacter textdag {\dagger}
\definecharacter paragraphmark {\paragraph}
\definecharacter textellipsis {\ellipsis}
\definecharacter textminus {\minus}
\definecharacter ostroke {\oslash}
\definecharacter textdollar {\dollar}
Is there some context convention for character names?
? I have a problem to define mathematics chars. I did:
\starttypescript [math] [dynamoRE] [st1]
\definefontsynonym [DynamoRE-Math-Letters] [sdgr8te]
[encoding=st1]
\definefontsynonym [DynamoRE-Math-Letters-Italic] [sdgri8te]
[encoding=st1]
\definefontsynonym [DynamoRE-Math-Symbols] [sdgr8te]
% \definefontsynonym [DynamoRE-Math-Extension] []
\stoptypescript
\starttypescript [math] [dynamoRE] [name]
\definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [DynamoRE-Math-Letters]
\definefontsynonym [MathItalic] [DynamoRE-Math-Letters-Italic]
\definefontsynonym [MathSymbol] [DynamoRE-Math-Symbols]
\definefontsynonym [MathExtension] [ComputerModernMath-Extension]
\stoptypescript
\starttypescript [DynamoRE] [st1,st2]
\definetypeface [DynamoRE] [ss] [sans] [dynamoRE] [default]
[encoding=\typescripttwo]
\definetypeface [DynamoRE] [mm] [math] [dynamoRE] [default]
[encoding=\typescripttwo]
\stoptypescript
\startmathcollection[storm]
\definemathcharacter [+] [bin] [sy] ["2B]
\definemathcharacter [=] [rel] [sy] ["3B]
\stopmathcollection
\enablemathcollection[storm]
$1+1=2$
But I get error: !Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
Where is the problem?
? - \starttypescript [*] [fallback] is generaly useful. Is a good idea
to move it from large type-buy.tex somewhere else?
? Storm fonts have different accent shapes for lover/upper case letters.
Is there some mechanism to distinguish this making the composits?
Thank you
Vit
More information about the ntg-context
mailing list