[NTG-context] Re: Learning ConTeXt, typical hurdle
Gerben.Wierda at rna.nl
Mon Mar 14 11:28:20 CET 2005
> Gerben Wierda wrote:
>> Apart from adapting, the \startitemize \stopitemize does not require me
>> to have a \par at the end. That is also confusing.
> That's because it's a different construct (less variants in visualization
I understand that, but for someone new to ConTeXt, the behaviour of
\whatever after a \definewhatever is unexpected. Especially so if one is
used to LaTeX.
The same is true for the non-implied start of a new column in \startable
after a new row has been declared.
My experience so far with ConTeXt is that it is probably possible to do
all the things I want to do (though I still have a couple of open issues,
see other posts) and I still have the feeling it is very powerful (I
already had that when I first read the manual years ago). But the error
messages I get or the behaviour I see when I make my beginner mistakes are
less illuminating than the LaTeX parts and the behaviour is also not
always friendly (e.g. the \NC needed after a new row in \starttable) or
intuitive or the same across diffferent parts of ConTeXt (\startitemize
versus \startwhatever). And it sometimes very difficult to find
documentation (directory structure, \starttable).
More information about the ntg-context