[Foxet] fonts again

h h extern pragma at wxs.nl
Sun Apr 3 22:40:47 CEST 2005

Adam Lindsay wrote:
> Bruce D'Arcus said this at Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:16:07 -0400:
>>Adam Lindsay wrote:
>>>Okay, you name 'Gill Sans' as the font family here, but to a computer,
>>>'Gill Sans' is not the same as 'GillSans' down below, right?
>>Part of the problem is that I've never really understood the logic of 
>>HOW ConTeXt thinks about fonts.  It's incredibly frustrating; right up 
>>there with trying to understand xml namespaces in a deep way!
> Even more frustrating is how foXet adds a slightly different, somewhat
> more modern and flexible way of thinking about fonts. 

hm, but it lacks a consistent body font model

> For me, the metaphor of pachinko keeps coming up when thinking about
> fonts in ConTeXt: each font synonym sets up another pin to bounce off

it's indeed a chain of mappings, but the advantage is that (in context) one can 
use symbolic names all over the place, like

\definefont[TitleFont][SerifBold at 50pt]

without bothering what SerifBold actually is (Palatino-Bold, PalatinoBold, 
PaladioSemi-Bold, etc)

[btw, in my opinion fo by design is platform dependent with regards to fonts]


                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
      tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                              | www.pragma-pod.nl

More information about the Foxet mailing list