[Dev-luatex] Proposal for new primitives

Hans Hagen j.hagen at xs4all.nl
Thu May 3 11:33:58 CEST 2018


On 5/2/2018 10:43 PM, Marcel Kr├╝ger wrote:
> Hi,
>   
> i want to propose two new primitives for LuaTeX:
>   
> - The existing `\luafunction` has some similarities to `\count`, `\dimen`, `\skip`. Especially for most use cases, you will have to allocate a number, but there is no equivalent to `\countdef` etc.
>     I think LuaTeX would benefit from `\luafunctiondef`, such that e.g. `\luafunctiondef\something1` would define `\something`, such that `\something` is equivalent to `\luafunction1`.
>    What is the difference to creating a regular macro? This would allow `\something` to be expandable in a single step, which is especially important for emulating primitives from other engines with lua code.

there are some more 'def' related things i am looking into (like if) but 
so far i refrained from adding them because of the extra overhead in 
memory etc etc and because it contradicts the go simplier philosophy (do 
in lua what can be done there) and functions are not like registers 
(\the stuff and so; in retrospect \attributedef could have been avoided too)

in the case of functions, sometimes you'd want to have an unexpandable 
variant which then demands a bit more (flags and so, some mix between 
def, let and such, always global but optionally protected), so far i'm 
not sure what is the best approach there but i have some ideas on it 
(better do it right instead of having to change it later)

so: if something like that happens if will probably be done in a more 
extensive and bit different way

> - Additionally it would be useful to allow "expandable temporary macro definitions". So for example
>   
>      \scantexmacro#1#2\stop{-#1-#2-}abc\stop def
>   
>    would expand to
>   
>      -a-bc-def
>   
>    This allows using the TeX macro argument parser inside expandable macros, especially when the delimiter can change. For example if you implement a property list as `\@key key1\@value value1\@key key2\@value value2...`, you can create an expandable macro to ge the value of key `#2` without requiring recursive calls with
>   
>      \def\propget#1#2{%
>        \scantexmacro##1\@key#2\@value##2\@key##3\stop{%
>          ##2%
>        }#1\@key#2\@value\@key\stop
>      }
>   
>    Another use-case would be implementingan expandable version of functionality similar to the expl3 `\seq_map_inline:Nn`.
>   
> What do think? Is there any chance to see something like this in LuaTeX?

that looks pretty horrible to me (one can argue if it fits into the 
concept)

(i can think of a lot of handy things that for instance context can 
benefit from but don't want such hack into the engine for it)

> I attached a first implementation as patch against the current experimental branch.

basically what you want is something \immediatemacro or \scanarguments 
without a real macro being defined and there is no need for something 
\long related stuff there (we might even kick out everything long at 
some point)

i'll have a look at something like that but no promisses

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
               Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
        tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------


More information about the dev-luatex mailing list