[Dev-luatex] pdftexversion, OmegaVersion etc.

Martin Schröder martin at oneiros.de
Mon Nov 29 17:16:22 CET 2010


2010/11/29 Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org>:
> I was wondering, since luatex is not a direct replacement of pdftex,
> omega or aleph, what is the point of having such primitives? Wouldn't it
> be more cleaner of they are removed or is there any use for them?
>
> pdftexversion
> pdftexrevision
>
> OmegaVersion
>
> AlephVersion
> Alephminorversion
> Alephrevision
> Alephversion
> Omegaminorversion
> Omegarevision
> Omegaversion
>
> eTeXVersion
> eTeXminorversion
> eTeXrevision
> eTeXversion

Macros that use these primitives (e.g. pdftex.def) will still work.

Best
   Martin


More information about the dev-luatex mailing list