[Dev-luatex] Snapshot 20070105

Arthur Reutenauer arthur.reutenauer at normalesup.org
Fri Jan 5 22:44:40 CET 2007

> To add to the general confusion, regular (level 0) ofm files report
>    (OFMLEVEL D 1)
> at the top of ofm2opl's output,

  Yes, that was it, and if you corrected it and ran opl2ofm on the
corrected output, it choked because it believed it was reading an ofm
level 65535 (or so); in the sources it was obvious there was a spurious
±1 at some stage... but interestingly enough, the whole ofm2opl / opl2ofm
/ etc. bundle was coherent with its own output (but not with the original

  If you're using Debian, I believe the binary is patched thanks to a
bug-report by my friend Joël Riou :-)

More information about the dev-luatex mailing list