[dev-context] Quoting problems in grph-con.lua
Hans Hagen
j.hagen at xs4all.nl
Sun Apr 21 15:34:50 CEST 2019
On 4/21/2019 1:04 PM, Kevin Boulain wrote:
>> I'm a bit reluctant to change this as it can break existing workflows.
>
> I understand the motivation but I don't understand the technical
> reason. This seems to be a simple shell quoting problem to me.
> I'm an inexperienced ConTeXt/TeX user though, so feel free to tell me
> I'm utterly wrong :)
>
>> What if you use "%[oldname]%" and don't feed an quoted argument?
>
> I'm not sure I understood: I'm not feeding a quoted argument,
> grph-con.lua introduces superfluous quotes, breaking the proper
> quoting introduced later by util-sbx.lua (since the shell is used to
> spawn the process).
> Let me try to explain it a little bit better.
Ok, but then the issue is not the name only
\enabletrackers[sandbox]
the sandbox runner always wraps so then we also need to remove quotes in
--export-%format%=%newname%
and such. (The original runners didn't do escaping.)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the dev-context
mailing list