[dev-context] Re: [NTG-context] font problems again
pragma at wxs.nl
Tue Nov 15 16:51:06 CET 2005
Adam Lindsay wrote:
>[changed to dev-context]
>Hans Hagen said this at Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:07:44 +0100:
>>lucida is a special case -)
>>because i used lucida a lot, those definitions ended up in the core, but
>>when i bought more and more fonts, i finally decided to move the lucida
>>defs to the type-buy.tex typescript because that;s where they belong
>>you can add the line:
>>to the cont-sys.tex file, but best is (because it's a document property)
>>to say in you document (or style):
>>\usetypescriptfile[type-buy] % loads commercial font definitions
>>\usetypescript[lucida][texnansi] % defines a lucida typeface
>>\setupbodyfont[lucida,12pt] % enables the typeface defined as
>That reminds me, Hans. The PCTeX edition of Lucida are floating around.
>I've done some preliminary typescripts, and they seem to fit in well. I
>need to track down some issues with obscure math characters (making them
>match CM math), figuring out if the discrepancy is in the current math-
>lbr definitions, or in changes with the new fonts.
>Other than that, what should the definitions be called?
> doing an override in type-dis?
is this the b&h lucida?
we can go for lucida-nova (as with optima-nova and palatino-nova -)
More information about the dev-context