Re: [NTG-pdftex] 1.40.4 incoming
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/1058c5aefa3802978e05193b3eb09fac.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:52:24PM +0200, Thanh Han The wrote:
On 07.07.2007 15:14, Martin Schr�der wrote:
Please test and tell me what I've forgotten. :-)
what about patch #813? It's rather straightforward and handy.
and also #812, if there is no further objection. Thanh
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d8110a8a8a97be0803549ea5ee2e638b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
2007/7/8, Thanh Han The
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:52:24PM +0200, Thanh Han The wrote:
what about patch #813? It's rather straightforward and handy.
and also #812, if there is no further objection.
Both are in. While we are looking at patches, what about - 746 PromptFileName - 811 Change warning mesage for conflicting font attributes Best Martin
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d8110a8a8a97be0803549ea5ee2e638b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
2007/7/9, Martin Schröder
2007/7/8, Thanh Han The
: On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:52:24PM +0200, Thanh Han The wrote:
what about patch #813? It's rather straightforward and handy.
and also #812, if there is no further objection.
Both are in. While we are looking at patches, what about - 746 PromptFileName - 811 Change warning mesage for conflicting font attributes
811 is already in. Best Martin
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/565476157eb3895a9c928ffce26d988d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Martin Schröder wrote:
2007/7/8, Thanh Han The
: On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:52:24PM +0200, Thanh Han The wrote:
what about patch #813? It's rather straightforward and handy. and also #812, if there is no further objection.
Both are in. While we are looking at patches, what about - 746 PromptFileName
You said you were waiting for discussion on tex-implementors (or tex-live). Was there any of that? Best, Taco
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d8110a8a8a97be0803549ea5ee2e638b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
2007/7/9, Taco Hoekwater
You said you were waiting for discussion on tex-implementors (or tex-live). Was there any of that?
There was a long discussion on TL (you were part of it:), nothing on tex-implementors that I remember. I think Karl summed it up nicely: \begin{quote} Since the simplest solution of aborting the job when RET is pressed does not appeal to Taco and Hans, my suggestion is to apply Heiko's other patch, so that it will retry with the exact name. At least that will avoid the reported bug of overwriting the input file, which seems pretty important. We could debate forever about ideal behavior. Let's not. Personally, I think it would also be very nice if CTRL-C in response to enter a filename prompt did something other than retrying a file, but (depressingly) I'm not prepared to implement it (again). \end{quote} Best Martin
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/565476157eb3895a9c928ffce26d988d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Martin Schröder wrote:
2007/7/9, Taco Hoekwater
: You said you were waiting for discussion on tex-implementors (or tex-live). Was there any of that?
There was a long discussion on TL (you were part of it:), nothing on tex-implementors that I remember. I think Karl summed it up nicely:
Perhaps I am getting too old for this kind or work. :( Thanks for the reminder, Taco
participants (3)
-
Martin Schröder
-
Taco Hoekwater
-
Thanh Han The